
Conclave
2024 · Edward Berger
The papal thriller that became a public utility when Pope Francis died months later and the entire internet admitted it learned conclave procedure from the movie — streaming numbers spiked 280%; "Conclave-pilled" entered the lexicon.
For when you want a grown-up page-turner of a movie — something twisty and handsome you can sink into on a weeknight and still have plenty to argue about at breakfast. Comfort-food suspense with real ideas underneath.
What it's about
The Pope dies suddenly, and Cardinal Lawrence must run the ancient, sealed-off ritual of electing his successor. Locked inside the Vatican with the Church's most powerful men, he uncovers blackmail, forged records, and hidden agendas among the front-runners — while wrestling with his own crisis of faith. Every ballot becomes a move in a quiet war for the soul of an institution.
The experience
A slow-coiling, whisper-quiet thriller where the tension comes from glances across a chapel and conversations in stairwells rather than chases. It's absorbing, sly, and surprisingly funny in flashes — the pleasure of watching very controlled men lose control by degrees.
Performances
Ralph Fiennes anchors the film as Lawrence, doing enormous work with stillness — doubt, exhaustion, and buried ambition all flickering across a face trying to stay neutral. Stanley Tucci, John Lithgow, and Isabella Rossellini each make a meal of limited screen time.
The craft
Edward Berger directs Peter Straughan's adaptation of Robert Harris's novel with immaculate control: crisp compositions of scarlet robes against marble, sequestered spaces shot at Cinecittà that feel both grand and suffocating, and a nervy, string-driven score that keeps the pulse up. It's a gorgeous film to watch on a big screen — the pageantry is half the point.
Why it matters
A major player of the 2024–25 awards season and a word-of-mouth hit that proved a talky, mid-budget adult drama could still pack theaters. It cemented Berger's standing as a director of prestige thrillers.
Snapshot
A tightly wound ecclesiastical thriller set entirely within the Vatican's sequestered conclave proceedings, Conclave follows Cardinal Lawrence (Ralph Fiennes), Dean of the College of Cardinals, as he shepherds a fractious papal election toward a conclusion while navigating blackmail, forgery, hidden identities, and his own corrosive private doubt. Adapted from Robert Harris's 2016 novel by screenwriter Peter Straughan and shot largely at Cinecittà studios in Rome, the film operates as a study in institutional anxiety: how ancient bureaucracies encode power, how men of God reason through ambition, and how secrecy becomes both the Church's greatest weapon and its deepest wound. Released in the United States by Focus Features in October 2024, Conclave earned wide critical praise and entered the 2024–25 awards season as a significant contender, garnering multiple Academy Award nominations including Best Picture.
Industry & production
Conclave is a UK–US co-production, developed by Film4 and Black Bear Pictures and distributed theatrically by Focus Features in North America and by Universal Pictures internationally. Edward Berger came to the project off the extraordinary success of All Quiet on the Western Front (2022), his German-language adaptation of Erich Maria Remarque's novel that won four Academy Awards including Best International Feature Film — a performance that gave Berger genuine leverage to mount an English-language prestige production at scale.
Robert Harris's novel had circulated in Hollywood for several years before Straughan's involvement. Harris, whose fiction frequently inhabits the corridors of institutional power — the Roman Senate in Imperium, MI6 in The Secret Service — provided a text already structured like a procedural mystery, with the conclave's rigid rules functioning as both plot engine and symbolic architecture. Straughan, whose screenwriting credits include Tomas Alfredson's Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy (2011), brought to the adaptation the same patience for bureaucratic texture and slow-building menace he had demonstrated with le Carré.
Shooting in the actual Vatican was not possible; the Church does not grant access for dramatic productions of this kind. Production designer — the specific credit should be verified against production records — reconstructed the Sistine Chapel, the Domus Sanctae Marthae, and the relevant corridors at Cinecittà, Rome's historic studio complex that has hosted everything from Fellini's productions to recent prestige television. The choice of Cinecittà was not merely practical: it placed the film within a lineage of Vatican-adjacent productions that includes Roma (1972) and The Young Pope (2016), and the studio's infrastructure is calibrated for large-scale period interiors.
The ensemble — Ralph Fiennes, Stanley Tucci, John Lithgow, Isabella Rossellini, Sergio Castellitto, and Carlos Diehm — was assembled with unusual care for tonal cohesion. Each major cardinal is engineered to represent a different axis of Church politics (conservative, progressive, African, North American), and the casting calibrates that ideological range through performers whose screen personas already carry corresponding weight.
Technology
Conclave was shot on film — a choice that meaningfully inflects the film's visual register. Cinematographer Stéphane Fontaine, working in collaboration with Berger, selected film stocks that emphasize granular texture and a slightly desaturated warmth, giving the ancient interiors an organic, pre-digital density that video or modern digital sensors would resist. The commitment to photochemical acquisition aligned with the film's broader commitment to tactile, material craft: the frescoes, cassocks, and stonework register with a solidity that digital clarity can ironically undermine.
The Sistine Chapel reconstruction required careful lighting design to approximate the quality of natural light filtered through the chapel's high windows — a controlled imitation of the uncontrollable, which suits the film's thematic concerns. Fontaine and the production team reportedly spent considerable preparation time studying the architectural light patterns of the actual space, though the precise technical documentation of this process had not entered the public scholarly record at the time of writing.
Sound recording in large stone-floored, hard-surfaced rooms presents distinctive challenges. The production's sound design — which leans into the reverberant, echo-laden acoustics of Vatican architecture — appears to have balanced location-style ambient capture with controlled studio recording. The film's sonic world is one of its subtler achievements.
Technique
Cinematography
Stéphane Fontaine, known primarily for his collaborations with Jacques Audiard (A Prophet, 2009; Rust and Bone, 2012) and his work on Pablo Larraín's Jackie (2016), brings to Conclave a visual grammar rooted in psychological interiority. His characteristic tool is the close-up deployed at moments of internal pressure — not the classical Hollywood close-up that registers a single emotion, but a searching, slightly uncomfortable proximity that holds the face as a contested surface, readable in competing ways simultaneously.
The film is notable for its controlled use of deep-focus compositions within large architectural spaces, alternating between the vertiginous grandeur of fresco-covered ceilings and the claustrophobic compression of dormitory corridors and antechambers. Color is held to a narrow, ecclesiastically appropriate palette — crimsons, blacks, gold, the flat white of ballot papers — and the film rarely introduces a hue that does not have doctrinal weight.
Camera movement is restrained, largely avoiding the kinetic urgency that marks contemporary thriller cinematography. When the camera does move — tracking slowly through a deliberating group, or drifting across the chapel floor — it does so with the unhurried gravity of institutional ritual, as though the camera itself has taken vows.
Editing
Editor Nick Emerson, who collaborated with Berger on All Quiet on the Western Front, constructs Conclave around the rhythms of deliberation rather than action. Cuts are often held longer than genre convention would demand; scenes breathe and accumulate rather than accelerate. The formal patience mirrors the conclave's own temporal structure — ballots, tally-marks, the burning of papers, the smoke signal — and produces a thriller whose tension is architectural rather than kinetic.
The editing of group scenes, particularly the Cardinals' formal sessions, is notably precise in its management of spatial geography: the viewer always knows where power sits in a room and where the camera's sympathies lie, without the film ever making that geometry explicit.
Mise-en-scène / staging
Berger stages Conclave as a theater of body language and proxemics. Cardinals' allegiances shift through how men position themselves in corridors, who they speak to across the refectory, which way they turn in a doorway. The Sistine Chapel balloting sequences, staged in rows facing the altar, impose a medieval spatial order on contemporary political calculation, and Berger exploits the ironized formality of men in liturgical costume engaged in what is effectively a political convention.
Spatial architecture is thematic: the permissiveness of certain rooms (the garden where cardinals speak privately) against the formal surveillance of others (the Chapel, the sessions) structures the film's moral geography. Privacy is always a negotiated exception within the conclave's total enclosure.
Sound
The score, by Volker Bertelmann (performing as Hauschka), sustains the chamber-music restraint he brought to All Quiet on the Western Front, for which he shared the Academy Award for Best Original Score. Bertelmann works largely in strings and sparse orchestration, with minimalist patterns that accumulate harmonic tension without resolving it — an appropriate formal analog to the film's story of institutional procedures that defer and defer judgment. Gregorian-adjacent choral elements appear selectively and are never used cheaply.
The ambient sound design deserves equal credit: the creak of stone floors, the rustle of cassocks, the muffled sound of Rome beyond the enclosure walls. Silence is deployed strategically, and the periodic absence of score produces some of the film's most uncomfortable moments.
Performance
Ralph Fiennes delivers a performance of sustained interior weather. Cardinal Lawrence is a man afflicted by doubt — a condition the film presents as simultaneously disqualifying (he has confessed it) and uniquely qualifying (it makes him honest) — and Fiennes builds this from habitual stillness interrupted by moments of uncontrolled feeling. The performance's precision is in its economy: Lawrence's distress is registered in jaw tension, in the pace at which he moves through rooms, in the micro-expressions that cross a face trained by decades of hierarchical discipline to reveal nothing.
Stanley Tucci (Cardinal Bellini), John Lithgow (Cardinal Tremblay), and Sergio Castellitto (Cardinal Tedesco) each anchor a distinct ideological position within the conclave while avoiding schematic reduction. Isabella Rossellini's Sister Agnes is among the film's finest creations — a figure who operates entirely outside the all-male electoral machinery and is therefore, the film implies, the only person fully capable of seeing it clearly.
Narrative & dramatic mode
Conclave is a procedural mystery organized around an election. Harris's novel structures its revelations as a series of escalating disclosures — each ballot surfacing a new secret — and Straughan's adaptation preserves this nested-revelation architecture while tightening the psychological focalization through Lawrence. The mode is what might be called the parliamentary thriller: power is exercised through procedure, and drama inheres in the violation or manipulation of rules rather than in physical action.
The film's third-act revelation — concerning Cardinal Benitez (Carlos Diehm) and his intersex identity — functions both as plot twist and as doctrinal disruption, posing the question of whether the Church's categories of gender are adequate to the actual range of human being. Harris embedded this device in his novel with deliberate theological seriousness, and Berger and Straughan treat it with corresponding care rather than as shock material.
Genre & cycle
Conclave belongs to a recognizable cycle of prestige institutional thrillers — films that locate conspiracy within hierarchies whose authority derives from tradition, secrecy, or specialized knowledge. The immediate antecedents include Costa-Gavras's European political films (Z, 1969; The Confession, 1970), Sidney Lumet's procedural dramas, and the American paranoid thrillers of the 1970s. More specifically, Vatican-set drama has its own small lineage: Michael Anderson's The Shoes of the Fisherman (1968), which similarly depicted a papal election, and Paolo Sorrentino's television series The Young Pope (2016) and The New Pope (2020), which occupied adjacent satirical and surrealist terrain.
The film also participates in the early twenty-first century revival of the adult prestige literary adaptation — films like Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, Hossein Amini's The Two Faces of January (2014), and other productions that resist both franchise logic and arthouse minimalism in favor of a crafted, character-driven middle register.
Authorship & method
Edward Berger works from literary source material with consistent curatorial instinct: his two most significant features, All Quiet on the Western Front and Conclave, are both adaptations of canonical novels, and both are distinguished by the rigor with which they subordinate cinematic spectacle to psychological and moral argument. Berger is not an action filmmaker using period or institutional settings as backdrop; he is a director for whom setting is argument, and whose camera observes its subjects with a certain sober German-inflected realism even when the material is operatic.
His collaboration with Stéphane Fontaine — replacing Berger's German-language cinematographer James Friend — reflects a deliberate internationalization of his filmmaking practice. Fontaine's fluency in the slow-burn, psychologically saturated European mode maps onto Berger's own sensibilities without friction.
Peter Straughan's contribution is foundational. His gift — developed in adaptations of le Carré and, before that, in the dark-comedy register of Tinker Tailor — is for sustaining moral complexity within genre structure, for screenplays that do not resolve into simple judgments even as they arrive at definitive plot conclusions.
Volker Bertelmann's sustained collaboration with Berger across two major productions constitutes a genuine creative partnership: the composer's post-minimalist austerity has become part of the Berger signature.
Movement / national cinema
Conclave occupies a productive ambiguity in terms of national cinema. Berger is German; the source novel is British; the financing is Anglo-American; the setting is entirely Roman; the cast is multinational. The film gravitates toward European art-cinema values — pacing, moral seriousness, performance style, resistance to narrative catharsis — while operating entirely within the infrastructure and commercial register of English-language prestige production.
This position reflects a structural condition of contemporary European filmmakers who achieve international recognition: the industrial pull of English-language production is met by a formal investment, at the level of cinematography and editing, that carries the discipline of European film schools and festival culture. Conclave is in this sense legible within British prestige production (via Film4) as well as within the emergent profile of a German director whose ambitions exceed the national language.
Era / period
Conclave is simultaneously contemporary and deliberately atemporal. The action takes place in modern Rome — mobile phones must be surrendered, the conclave is tracked by the global media outside the walls — but the visual and procedural world of the film is medieval. This temporal doubling is the film's governing irony: an institution that has preserved its forms across centuries attempting to govern itself, through those same forms, in the present.
The film is of its cultural moment in its interest in the gap between institutional self-presentation and institutional reality — a concern that runs across the prestige television and film of the 2010s and 2020s, from The Crown to Succession to Oppenheimer. The Catholic Church's particular crisis of authority (child abuse scandals, questions of doctrinal modernization, the politics of the Francis papacy) provides an implicit context that the film does not explicitly invoke but that any 2024 viewer carries in.
Themes
At its center, Conclave is a film about doubt as a moral condition. Cardinal Lawrence's private confession that he no longer knows what he believes is presented not as disqualification but as the only honest theological position available to an intelligent modern believer. The film argues — carefully and without didacticism — that certainty, in men of institutional power, is the most dangerous quality of all.
Adjacent themes include: the corruption that accrues to all large institutions regardless of their spiritual mandate; the structural exclusion of women from Catholic governance (Sister Agnes's perspective punctures the Cardinals' self-seriousness at precisely calibrated moments); the way identity categories (doctrinal, gendered, national) are instruments of power before they are descriptions of persons; and the cyclical, self-perpetuating nature of hierarchies that select their own successors.
The ballot papers — white until decision, burned after each inconclusive vote — are the film's governing image: the secrecy that makes the process sacred also makes it ungovernable, and the smoke that rises from the Vatican chimney to signal election or failure is legible to the world only as binary, concealing everything that produced it.
Reception, canon & influence
Conclave was received with consistent critical admiration upon its premiere and wide release in autumn 2024. Critics cited the film's formal discipline, Fiennes's performance, and Berger's capacity to sustain tension through procedure rather than action. It earned Academy Award nominations including Best Picture, Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay (Straughan), Best Film Editing (Emerson), and Best Costume Design (Lisy Christl), among others. Peter Straughan won the Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay, a recognition that ratified the film's status as a major literary adaptation.
Looking backward: the film draws on the tradition of European political cinema, particularly the Costa-Gavras mode of institutional conspiracy; on the 1970s American paranoid thriller; and on Harris's own acknowledged debt to Graham Greene's Catholic moral fiction — a lineage that runs from The Power and the Glory through The Third Man to Harris's procedural intelligence. The Shoes of the Fisherman (1968) is the most direct filmic antecedent for the papal-election narrative, though Harris's and Berger's treatments are structurally and tonally distinct. The influence of Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy is discernible in Straughan's approach to bureaucratic loyalty and betrayal.
Looking forward: Conclave's legacy is still forming at the time of writing. Its most probable influence is as a model for English-language prestige adaptations of institutional fiction — demonstrating that an adult, formally rigorous, non-franchise film can succeed critically and commercially if given sufficient craft investment and a strong ensemble. Berger's emergence as a major English-language director of European sensibility — comparable in trajectory to figures like Wolfgang Petersen or Roland Emmerich, though in an entirely different register — makes Conclave a significant career document. Whether the film will enter the established canon of Vatican cinema or of the political thriller genre depends on how subsequent films and scholars position it; the critical consensus of the immediate reception strongly suggests it will endure.
A Deleuzian reading
Watch Ralph Fiennes during a ballot count.
The full Deleuzian reading of Conclave →
Reception
A polite awards-season hit in 2024 (it won the Adapted Screenplay Oscar), it got a wild second act in 2025 when Pope Francis actually died and a real conclave began — suddenly it was a current-events explainer, and streaming viewership spiked overnight.
How Conclave was received, from release to now →
Influences: the films it descends from and the films it influenced
- The Shoes of the Fisherman (1968) — The only direct filmic antecedent for the papal conclave as narrative machinery: the sealed electoral procedure, the fumata nera/bianca, and Vatican ceremonial architecture functioning as an institutional pressure-chamber that Berger inherits as structural template — the conclave-as-thriller form begins here.
- Z (1969) — The cited Costa-Gavras mode that Berger channels: institutional conspiracy revealed through procedural accumulation — depositions, documents, reluctant witnesses — rather than physical action, constructing the political thriller as moral indictment of a corrupt institution protecting itself.
- The Third Man (1949) — The Graham Greene lineage the dossier explicitly names: architectural geography (Vienna's sewers and rubble) encoding moral corruption, and nested revelation — the trusted figure's double life disclosed through investigative procedure — as the structural device Straughan transposes to the conclave setting.
- The Conformist (1970) — Storaro's deep-focus staging within fascist-institutional architecture as moral argument — characters diminished in ceremonial halls, power made legible through spatial composition — establishing the visual grammar Fontaine and Berger inherit for rendering Vatican corridors as geometry of authority.
- Ida (2013) — Photochemical acquisition, severely restricted gray-ochre palette, figures isolated in the lower quadrant of a deep-focus frame, and interior stillness performance within religious institutional architecture — the formal template Fontaine and Berger's visual approach most directly echoes in the convent and conclave spaces.
- Jackie (2016) — Stéphane Fontaine's cinematography — close-up interiority on a face under extreme institutional pressure, 16mm-grain restricted palette, camera sustained at proximity to a performance of interior stillness — is the exact instrument Fontaine transfers to Fiennes in Conclave, the method unchanged across director and subject.
- Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy (2011) — Peter Straughan co-scripted both films; the le Carré method he distilled here — bureaucratic loyalty and betrayal sustained within genre structure, arriving at plot resolution without moral resolution, institutional secrecy revealed through the slow accumulation of small disclosures — transfers intact to Conclave's Cardinal Benítez revelation.
- The Remains of the Day (1993) — Hopkins's performance mode of interior stillness — institutional loyalty rationalized as virtue while suppressing moral judgment, repression performed as dignity — establishes the register Fiennes inhabits as Lawrence, within a comparably hierarchical architectural space where rank is encoded in who occupies which rooms.
- All Quiet on the Western Front (2022) — Berger's preceding film established the Berger–Bertelmann creative partnership: Bertelmann's post-minimalist score austerity — sustained tones, avoided resolution — and Berger's directorial method of subordinating period spectacle to psychological and moral argument carry forward unchanged into Conclave.
- Oppenheimer (2023) — Berger builds a feature-length thriller entirely within institutional pressure-chamber staging — cardinals sequestered in sealed rooms, voting procedures as suspense mechanics — extending Oppenheimer's demonstration that large-scale drama can sustain itself through procedural confrontation and interiority alone.
- The Good Shepherd (2004) — Builds a present-day ecclesiastical whodunit as pure chamber mystery — sealed Vatican interiors, ritual sound, painterly sacred chiaroscuro — the contemporary apex of the 'chamber-mystery'/'ecclesiastical-chiaroscuro' staging the seed essays.
- A Prophet (2009) — Fontaine's cinematography in a sealed institutional space — corridors, cells, common rooms — where deep focus and spatial geography establish the power structure without expository dialogue; the same visual grammar he deploys in the Vatican's halls to map who moves freely and who is watched.
- Spotlight (2015) — The Catholic institutional secrecy thriller built on procedural nested revelation: dramatic tension accumulated through documents, phone calls, and reluctant testimony rather than physical confrontation, arriving at institutional indictment through editorial accumulation — the identical formal strategy, the identical institution.
- Tár (2022) — Interior stillness performance — Blanchett, like Fiennes, playing an institution's most powerful representative under mounting pressure — observed in deep focus with deliberate pacing; long takes watching a character conduct institutional ritual while concealing interior collapse.
- The Favourite (2018) — Institutional intrigue conducted entirely within a closed architectural space whose geometry encodes power — chambers, corridors, throne rooms — with proxemics of approach and retreat as the primary political language, and restricted palette reinforcing the hermetic claustrophobia of the succession contest.
- Maria (2024) — Fontaine shot both in the same year with the same restricted-palette close-up method: 35mm grain, sustained camera proximity to a performance of suppressed interiority, institutional spaces — the opera world and the Vatican alike — rendered in muted ochres and grays as environments that contain and observe their subjects.
- Pressure (2026) — Bertelmann again, over a sealed-chamber procedural on a fixed clock where balloting protocol carries the suspense and the outside world intrudes only as sound breaking through a window.
Similar films
- TÁR (2022) — influence & lineage
- Spotlight (2015) — influence & lineage
- The Count of Monte Cristo (2024) — often watched together
- All Quiet on the Western Front (2022) — influence & lineage · often watched together
- Black Bag (2025) — often watched together
- It Was Just an Accident (2025) — often watched together
- La Grazia (2025) — shared sensibility
- Heretic (2024) — shared sensibility
All the films related to Conclave →
Watch it with: curated runs of related films
- Locked In With the Powerful — A run of elegant, twisty chamber pieces where the rich and the powerful gather in one sealed world — an island restaurant, a Greek estate, a gothic mansion, the sealed Vatican — and the social order gets carved up in front of you.