
2005 · Raoul Peck
For when you're ready to actually confront a piece of history rather than be comforted about it — a demanding, necessary watch, not a casual one. Choose it when you want to understand, and give it your full attention.
Rwanda, 1994: as the genocide begins, a Hutu soldier married to a Tutsi woman tries to protect his family through the hundred days of killing, while his brother broadcasts hate radio. A decade later, the two men face each other again — one living with what happened, the other awaiting trial at the international tribunal. The film moves between the catastrophe and its aftermath, asking not just what happened but what accountability could even look like.
Sober, unflinching, and heavy in the way it should be — this is not a rescue story with an uplifting exit, and it doesn't look away. The dual timeline gives you room to breathe, but the weight accumulates; it's the kind of film you sit with in silence afterward.
Idris Elba, in one of his first major dramatic leads, is quietly devastating — a man carrying survival and guilt in the same body, doing his biggest acting in stillness.
Raoul Peck shot on location in Rwanda, casting survivors and filming at actual massacre sites with their communities' cooperation, and that decision gives every frame a documentary gravity no set could fake. The two-timeline structure is the film's argument: genocide is not just an event but an aftermath of complicity, testimony, and imperfect justice.
Made for HBO and released the same season as Hotel Rwanda, it stands as the sterner, survivor-centered counterpoint — and as an early landmark for Peck, who went on to become one of cinema's essential political filmmakers with I Am Not Your Negro.
Reception & legacy: how Sometimes in April was received, argued over, and remembered →
Raoul Peck — the Haitian director and former culture minister who would later make I Am Not Your Negro — answers the question of how cinema should face the 1994 Rwandan genocide with rigor rather than uplift. Where Hotel Rwanda offered a rescuer's narrative, Peck structures his film as a wound examined a decade on: an ex-soldier (a quietly devastating Idris Elba) navigates the hundred days of killing in one timeline while, in 2004, he confronts his brother, a former hate-radio broadcaster awaiting trial at the international tribunal in Arusha. The dual structure insists that genocide is not only an event but an aftermath — of complicity, testimony and the vexed possibility of justice. Peck shot on location in Rwanda, casting survivors and filming at actual massacre sites with their cooperation, and the film carries the weight of that permission. Produced for HBO but premiered in competition at the Berlinale, and screened in Rwanda itself before international audiences saw it, it remains among the most morally serious dramatizations of the catastrophe — attentive, too, to the Western officials who parsed the word 'genocide' while the machetes did their work.
Lines of influence