← back
Hell or High Water poster

Hell or High Water

2016 · David Mackenzie

A divorced dad and his ex-con brother resort to a desperate scheme in order to save their family's farm in West Texas.

dir. David Mackenzie · 2016

Snapshot

A lean, sun-scorched crime drama in which two West Texas brothers — methodical Toby (Chris Pine) and volatile Tanner (Ben Foster) — rob branches of a single bank chain to reclaim the family ranch from foreclosure, while an aging Texas Ranger (Jeff Bridges) and his half-Comanche partner (Gil Birmingham) close in. Released under the title Comancheria in the United Kingdom, the film arrived in August 2016 and found an audience far beyond its modest arthouse origins, earning four Academy Award nominations including Best Picture and Best Original Screenplay. It is at once a taut heist procedural, an elegy for a dispossessed rural America, and a moral argument conducted through landscape: the predatory bank is not so different, the film insists, from the outlaws draining it dry.


Industry & production

The script, written by Taylor Sheridan under the working title Comancheria, was developed independently before Sheridan had established himself as a screenwriter of note. Sheridan — then primarily known as an actor (Sons of Anarchy, Veronica Mars) — had only recently completed Sicario (dir. Denis Villeneuve, 2015) for his feature debut as a writer, and Hell or High Water was drafted in parallel with that project, reflecting an intensive period of creative output. The film was produced by Sidney Kimmel Entertainment and OddLot Entertainment, with CBS Films and Lionsgate acquiring distribution rights. The production budget was modest — widely reported in the low-to-mid teens of millions of dollars, though precise figures have not been officially confirmed by the studio — and the shoot was correspondingly tight.

Principal photography took place primarily in New Mexico, with locations around Albuquerque, Tucumcari, and the high desert plains serving as stand-ins for West Texas. The choice was pragmatic (New Mexico's film-incentive infrastructure) but also aesthetically consistent: the scrubby, treeless expanse of the eastern New Mexico basin reads visually and geologically as continuous with the Texas Panhandle. Some sequences were shot across the state line, and the unit was careful to preserve the Permian Basin visual grammar — pump jacks, feedlots, dying main streets — that gives the film its documentary grain.


Technology

Hell or High Water was photographed digitally rather than on film, a practical decision consistent with the production's budget and schedule. Cinematographer Giles Nuttgens shot in an anamorphic format, producing the characteristic widescreen ratio and elliptical lens bokeh that the film uses to hold the landscape in almost oppressive peripheral presence behind its characters. The choice of anamorphic glass for a digital shoot was deliberate: it evokes the Panavision grammar of the 1970s American cinema the film consciously cites while remaining legible and cost-effective in post-production. The resulting image is wide and somewhat harsh in its highlights — overexposed in the noon glare, cooler and more luminous at dusk — without resorting to the desaturated, heavy-grade palette that became a cliché of prestige crime cinema in the period. Color remained relatively naturalistic, letting the raw West Texas palette do its own work.


Technique

Cinematography

Nuttgens and Mackenzie made the landscape do moral work. The camera does not aestheticize desolation for its own sake — it is not the Badlands lyric mode — but neither does it adopt a purely observational flatness. Wide establishing shots hold the brothers' truck as a small, deliberate object moving through indifferent terrain; close-ups in the bank robberies are jittery and close-quartered, generating claustrophobia that contrasts with the vistas outside. The film employs a recurring visual grammar of frames-within-frames: windows of diners, the windshields of patrol cars, the latticed shadows of a ranch-house porch. Characters are seen partially, enclosed, defined by the boundaries of structures that are themselves crumbling. Nuttgens's light is practical and unforgiving — the sun is too bright, the interior diner scenes underlit — producing a textural realism that resists glamorization.

Editing

Jake Roberts edited the film with a pace that respects the laconic rhythms of the script without becoming sluggish. The cutting between the brothers' arc and the lawmen's arc creates a procedural tension without resorting to parallel editing as a pure suspense mechanism; the film is interested in the conversation between these lines of action, not in cliff-hanging intercutting. Roberts's choices in the robbery sequences are restrained — functional coverage, no kinetic flash — which makes the sudden outbursts of violence (particularly in the film's third act) register as genuine shocks rather than choreography. The editing also carries the film's comedy: the long-running joke between Hamilton and Parker, with Hamilton's relentlessly provocative ethnic teasing, is cut with a deadpan timing that preserves the banter's uncomfortable affection.

Mise-en-scène / staging

Mackenzie's staging consistently externalizes the film's economic argument. The main streets of the Texas towns through which the brothers pass are galleries of institutional failure: storefronts advertising payday loans, billboards offering debt relief, empty lots that once held the local businesses of a functioning community. The camera lingers on these signs without underlining them through score or close-up — they accumulate, quietly, as context. The bank interiors are identical no matter the town, the franchise indistinguishable from its branch: this visual fungibility is the point. The family ranch, by contrast, is particular, worn, located — a place with a history, however painful. Mackenzie stages the film's few scenes of domestic tenderness (Toby with his sons) in warm, confined interiors that register as worth protecting precisely because they are so provisional.

Sound

Nick Cave and Warren Ellis composed the score, their fifth major collaboration by this point, following The Proposition (2005), The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford (2007), The Road (2009), and Lawless (2012). Their characteristic approach — sparse, modal, built from pedal steel, bowed strings, and ambient drone — was already associated with a certain strain of revisionist Western melancholy, and the Hell or High Water score deepens that association. The music seldom announces itself; it operates more as an atmospheric pressure than a cue. Two songs bookend the film: Gillian Welch and David Rawlings's "Didn't Leave Nobody But the Baby" (from the O Brother, Where Art Thou? soundtrack, a choice that carries its own intertextual weight in the context of Southern Gothic crime) is notably absent; the film uses original material and period-appropriate country and Americana without reaching for the Coen Brothers' aesthetic. The ambient sound design — wind, dry grass, the distant percussion of pump jacks — is mixed with care, and silence is used economically but tellingly.

Performance

Jeff Bridges's Marcus Hamilton is the film's warmest performance and arguably its most complex. Bridges plays retirement-averse weariness with a light hand — the character's bigotry toward Parker is established as a form of affection, a lifelong habit of provocation between two men who have ridden together for decades, though the film does not entirely excuse it. His final scene, alone with the knowledge of what he has lost and what he knows, is among the quietest and most affecting moments in his long career. Ben Foster's Tanner is detonation in human form, but Foster resists making him simply dangerous; there is a kind of luminous fatalism in Tanner that reads as a man who has always known how his story ends and has decided, therefore, to be magnificent in it. Chris Pine's casting was widely noted as counter-intuitive — he had been primarily an action and franchise lead — and the film uses his natural ease to shade Toby's calculation. Toby is the planner, the one who loves his sons, the one who has done the math on what this will cost; Pine communicates all of that in the way he listens, the way he holds still. Gil Birmingham's Alberto Parker, easily the film's most underwritten role, nevertheless carries enormous dignity and gets the film's most piercing monologue: the history of dispossession from Comanche to rancher to bank, delivered across a diner table with quiet fury.


Narrative & dramatic mode

The film operates in a modified heist-procedural mode in which the usual suspense mechanics (will they get away with it?) are subordinated to an ethical inquiry (are they wrong?). Sheridan's script is structured so that the audience understands Toby's plan before the lawmen do, but more importantly understands his motivation: the bank foreclosing on the family ranch has discovered, after a mineral survey, that the land sits atop an oil reserve that Toby's mother never knew about; the foreclosure is not merely financial pressure but a specific corporate predation. This revelation, held until fairly late in the film, retroactively reframes every robbery as a form of redistribution. The narrative is also organized around a studied parallel — the brothers occupy the same moral and economic position as the bank, taking money that is not theirs from people who cannot afford to lose it — but Sheridan's script earns the parallel by making Toby's plan precise: they steal only from Texas Midlands branches, launder the cash through a casino, and use the proceeds to pay off the bank with its own money. The neatness of this is morally instructive rather than heroic.


Genre & cycle

Hell or High Water belongs to the post-2008 neo-Western, a cycle of American crime films that filtered the landscape and conventions of the Western through the material conditions of the Great Recession and its aftermath. Films in this loose grouping — Winter's Bone (2010), Mud (2012), Lean on Pete (2017), Leave No Trace (2018) — share a concern with dispossession, rural precarity, and the failure of American economic mythology in specific, provincial places. Within this cycle, Hell or High Water is unusual in its explicitness: the enemy is not abstract hardship but a named, franchised bank, and the film's politics of resentment are never ambiguous about their target. Its other generic coordinates include the outlaw-couple (or sibling-pair) road film (Badlands, Bonnie and Clyde), the elegiac lawman Western (No Country for Old Men, Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada), and the procedural crime film in the American tradition of Michael Mann. The film is also, unusually for its period, a comedy in its procedural half — the Hamilton-Parker scenes are consistently, drily funny — which leavens the political anger without deflating it.


Authorship & method

David Mackenzie (b. 1966, Scotland) came to the project as a genuinely foreign eye on American mythology. His prior work — Young Adam (2002), Hallam Foe (2006), Starred Up (2013) — was primarily British, and rooted in the psychological claustrophobia of enclosed masculine spaces. Starred Up, a prison film, demonstrated his ability to sustain tension through behavioral observation and performance rather than plot mechanism. The American Western presented him with an inverse spatial problem: almost infinite exterior space containing the same interior compression. His direction of Hell or High Water is notable for what it does not do — it does not mythologize, does not slow-motion, does not reach for the operatic register that the genre convention would permit. The result is a film that treats the Western landscape as ordinary rather than sublime: these are people who live here, not visitors to an icon.

Giles Nuttgens, also Scottish, had been collaborating with Mackenzie since Young Adam, and the shared sensibility — realism first, beauty where it arrives naturally — is evident. Nuttgens has spoken in interviews about resisting the temptation to over-compose the landscapes, preferring to let the locations dictate the frame rather than imposing a painterly signature.

Taylor Sheridan brought the screenplay's specific moral architecture and its precise regional knowledge. Raised in Texas and working cattle as a young man, Sheridan wrote from a place of firsthand familiarity with the economic geography the film depicts. His screenwriting in this period — Sicario, Hell or High Water, then Wind River (which he also directed) — constitutes a sustained examination of American institutional failure at the territorial margins: the border, the Plains, the reservation. The Hell or High Water script is the most formally elegant of the three, its doubled structure (brothers and lawmen) rhyming structurally with its thematic argument about who the real thieves are.

Nick Cave and Warren Ellis were by this point so associated with the revisionist Western score that their involvement functioned partly as a generic signal, cueing the audience's expectations of moral ambiguity and landscape tragedy. Whether this constitutes a limitation or a refinement is a matter of critical perspective; the score is effective on its own terms.


Movement / national cinema

The film occupies an interesting position in American cinema precisely because it was made largely by non-Americans. Mackenzie and Nuttgens are Scottish; Cave and Ellis, Australian and Australian-British respectively. The "outsider Western" is a legitimate tradition — Leone's Spaghetti Westerns, Wim Wenders's Paris, Texas — and Hell or High Water benefits from the same defamiliarizing distance, the same ability to see the iconography of the American West as a set of codes to be read rather than a patrimony to be reverenced. Sheridan's American authorship of the script anchors the film in genuine particularity; the international crew supplies the critical angle. The result is less nostalgia than autopsy.


Era / period

The film was shot in 2015 and released in August 2016, in the final months of the Obama presidency. It arrived, however, as a document that many critics immediately recognized as prophetically legible to the Trump election that November: an anatomy of the white rural economic resentment that would become the dominant interpretive frame for that political moment. This retrospective legibility was not the film's design — Sheridan has been explicit that the script predated the political moment — but it sharpened the film's reception and extended its cultural shelf life. Hell or High Water became, for a period, one of the primary artistic exhibits cited in discussions of what might be called "flyover cinema": work that took seriously the material and psychological conditions of non-coastal, non-metropolitan America.


Themes

The film's organizing theme is the inheritance of theft. Alberto Parker's diner monologue encapsulates it: Comanche stole this land from others; white settlers stole it from Comanche; the banks stole it from the settlers; now the brothers are stealing it back from the banks. Every act of possession in the film is also an act of dispossession, and what looks like criminal deviance (the robberies) is revealed as the smallest and most targeted instance in a centuries-long cycle. The film is also, beneath the socioeconomic argument, a study in fraternal love: Tanner and Toby are bound by obligation that exceeds reason, and the film does not flinch from the cost that this bond exacts. Toby's sons appear briefly but centrally — the reason for everything, the future Toby is purchasing. Against the masculine elegies of the lawmen (Hamilton's imminent retirement, Parker's quiet gravity), the film poses a question about whether anything in this landscape is worth transmitting to the next generation, and whether the act of transmission is itself a form of violence.


Reception, canon & influence

Hell or High Water received near-unanimous critical acclaim on release, with particular praise directed at Sheridan's screenplay, Bridges's performance, and the film's political coherence. Its four Academy Award nominations — Best Picture, Best Supporting Actor (Bridges), Best Film Editing (Jake Roberts), Best Original Screenplay (Sheridan) — confirmed its standing as a prestige film that had significantly outperformed its origins. It won none, losing Best Picture to Moonlight in a ceremony remembered for other reasons.

Influences on the film (backward): The debts are worn openly. The doubled lawman-criminal structure, the elegiac Texas landscape, and the late-Cormac McCarthy moral universe all invoke No Country for Old Men (Coen Brothers, 2007) as the film's most proximate predecessor; Mackenzie's film might be understood as a corrective, restoring the political-economic ground that the Coens' more metaphysical film brackets. Sam Peckinpah's late Westerns (The Wild Bunch, 1969; Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid, 1973) contribute the mythology of the outlaw as a figure of displaced social energy. Peter Bogdanovich's The Last Picture Show (1971) supplies the grammar of West Texas institutional decay. The lawman's point of view — weary, funny, too late — recalls Tommy Lee Jones's work in both No Country and Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada (2005). Michael Mann's attention to the professionalism of criminals (Heat, 1995) is visible in the brothers' disciplined method.

Legacy (forward): The film's most substantial legacy is Taylor Sheridan's subsequent career. Wind River (2017), which he directed from his own script, extended the Frontier Trilogy's project, and his creation of Yellowstone (2018–) transformed its sensibility into a mass-audience television franchise of remarkable commercial scale. Whether Yellowstone represents a fulfillment or a dilution of the Hell or High Water political project is a question the critical record has not definitively settled. More narrowly, the film contributed to a renewed critical legitimacy for the neo-Western crime drama as an awards-viable form, helping to establish the conditions in which films like First Cow (2019) and The Power of the Dog (2021) could be seriously considered as prestige objects. Its influence on the representation of post-recession rural America in prestige cinema is diffuse but real, and its use of landscape as economic argument rather than aesthetic decoration has been widely cited as a model.

Lines of influence