← Jujutsu Kaisen 0
Jujutsu Kaisen 0 poster

Jujutsu Kaisen 0 · essays & theory

2021 · Sunghoo Park

A reading · through the lens of theory

A boy stands almost perfectly still. Behind him something vast unfolds, protean, and it has far too many teeth. He is the thing being fought over. He is not the one fighting.

Hold that arrangement in your head, because it is the whole film.

Yuta Okkotsu is bound to Rika, the cursed spirit of his dead childhood friend, and the ordinary way to describe Jujutsu Kaisen 0 is as shōnen: timid boy enters hidden school, acquires found family, gets strong, beats the villain. That description is accurate, and it misses what the animation is actually doing. Deleuze has a better name for it, and the name is not flattering to the hero. Rika is an impulse-image.

Deleuze reserved a whole category for films where behavior isn't decision but appetite: drives that erupt underneath the social surface and drag everything down a slope. Its signature is the mouth, the part-object, the thing that consumes. The film's design commits to this with no ambiguity. Rika is staged as scale and hunger, a body that refuses to hold a shape, and the craft debt is traceable: the asymmetric, orifice-heavy monster vocabulary that Jujutsu Kaisen inherits from Kawajiri's Ninja Scroll (1993), a bestiary built out of openings.

Deleuze pairs the impulse-image with two spaces, and JJK 0's art direction hands them over intact. There is a derived milieu: concrete, furnished, dated, with rules. And there is an originary world showing through it, formless, where only drives live. The film's two design worlds are exactly this. Jujutsu High has uniforms, a curriculum, a blindfolded mentor who is untouchable in every sense. Curse-space has no floor. The school is not the opposite of curse-space. It is the administration built on top of it, because the appetite was already there and somebody had to write a syllabus.

Now the camera, which is where Sunghoo Park's specific decision lives. The film has two camera behaviors and it refuses to blend them. In combat the virtual camera swoops and cranes, circles a strike mid-motion, racks between foreground and background planes. In Yuta's scenes it stops dead. The framing tightens into a held close-up and stays. Deleuze calls the result a movement of world. Normally a character moves through a world that sits still; here the character goes still and the world does the moving on his behalf. He is the pivot, not the agent. The face he holds is a potisign, the intensive face: not one clean emotion but micro-movements piling up toward a threshold nobody has crossed yet. Megumi Ogata's vocal performance is the same instrument, a wavering timidity that hardens across the arc, audible as pressure long before it is audible as resolve.

In animation this is also a budget decision, which makes it sharper. Drawings cost money. Yuta gets stillness. Rika gets density. The theatrical increment goes almost entirely into the thing that isn't him.

Worth pausing on a wrinkle in the theory, because Deleuze built his system out of photography. Cinema broke with the older arts, he argued, by sampling motion at any-instant-whatever: mechanical, equidistant, indifferent slices, none of them posed. Painting and sculpture gave you the privileged instant, the decisive stylized pose. Anime undoes that break on purpose. Drawn on ones and threes, holding on an impact frame, flinging a smear across the gap between two poses, this cinema chooses which instants get to exist. JJK 0's action grammar is a rhythm made of privileged instants with nothing sampled between them. The debris bursts come straight out of Akira (1988), where force reads as flying particulate rather than a clean beam; the elastic smears and impact holds descend from Koike's Redline (2009). The intervals aren't captured. They're skipped. Watch a hold on contact and you are watching the pose come back, repurposed for speed.

Cursed energy itself belongs to Deleuze's expressionism, where light and matter carry a life that isn't organic, things animate without being alive. Here it's produced as a compositing problem: drawn linework wrapped in particle and glow passes, smoke that appears to have intentions. The debt is to The End of Evangelion (1997), whose multi-pass compositing let photographic-grade lighting sit on top of 2D cels so that an emotional collapse could be finished, literally, at the compositing stage. Grief as a render pass. That is the technique JJK 0 inherits and industrializes. The moving camera has its own ancestor: the ground-level continuous takes threading blade choreography in Sword of the Stranger (2007). And Yuta's whole register, a grief-haunted loner whose interiority is inseparable from how fluidly he kills, comes down from Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust (2000).

The last act does obey the oldest shape in Deleuze's movement-image, the large form: an encompassing situation presses down until one decisive act transforms it. Geto, soft-spoken, ideological, a mirror of Yuta with the grief swapped out for a program, forces the mass-curse crisis, and the edit builds the confrontation as one sustained crescendo. Following Eisenstein, Deleuze calls that construction pathetic montage, where collision produces a new quality rather than more of the old one. The jump isn't power. It's a change in what the relation is called. Rika stops being a possession and becomes a connection, and she is the symbol in Deleuze's narrow sense: the single object in which a film's organizing relation is condensed. Every choice about her teeth and her scale is an argument about what love turns into when it can't let go.

What did the film do? Industrially, it proved the second one. Mugen Train showed that a television anime could become a theatrical event; JJK 0 showed it could be done again on demand, from a slight prequel manga, with a numeral in the title announcing that this feature is a node in a franchise rather than a self-standing work. That genuinely changes what a movie is for. The formal consequence is where the money lands. Not on narrative complexity, which stays a clean three acts, but on density of movement and finishing. The modern anime feature turns out to be a machine for rendering an interior state as weather.

So rewatch it, and during the fights don't watch the fights. Watch Yuta. Watch how little he does, how often the camera leaves him planted while the world tears itself apart around him on his behalf. Then the question the film never says out loud gets sharp: is Rika a character, or is she a condition? The film's answer is that from the inside, being loved and being wanted by an appetite are very hard to tell apart.

Concepts in play