← Raising Arizona
Raising Arizona poster

Raising Arizona · essays & theory

1987 · Joel Coen

A reading · through the lens of theory

The camera tears across the linoleum, hits the foot of a ladder, and climbs it — rung by rung, faster than any hand could carry it — until it shoves its lens into the screaming face of H.I. McDunnough. Nobody is holding this camera. No character's eyes belong to it. It is not Hi's point of view and not the Snoats brothers' and not God's; it is a thing in the room that has decided to charge. Watch Raising Arizona once for the jokes and a second time for that camera, and you start to see the movie's secret engine: a vision with no human behind it, loose in a world of trailer parks and Huggies.

Deleuze had a name for an image like this — what he called the gramme, or photogramme, the camera-eye freed from any human center, behaving like pure matter rather than somebody's look. Most movies anchor the camera to a person who sees; the Coens cut that cord. Barry Sonnenfeld mounts the camera low, inches off the ground, and lets it skim, swoop, and pounce, so that ordinary space — a convenience store, a nursery, a yard at night — becomes a track for a predator that is only velocity. The debt here is exact and worth naming: the Coens lifted this ground-skimming rush straight from Sam Raimi's The Evil Dead, where the gliding camera was a demonic force hunting teenagers in a cabin. Joel had cut that film; he and Ethan had co-written Raimi's Crimewave. In Arizona the same predatory glide migrates from horror into slapstick — identical speed, now milking a laugh instead of a scream. That is a real invention, not a flourish: weaponized camera mobility as comedy.

For all that strangeness, the bulk of the film is Deleuze's movement-image running at full throttle. The movement-image is his term for cinema's default grammar — a character perceives a situation and acts to change it, and the cut serves the chain of action. Hi sees a rack of Huggies, robs the store, and runs; what follows is the diaper-run set piece, ten minutes of escalating flight through suburban yards pursued by clerks, dogs, a pickup, and gunfire, sustained almost purely by cutting rhythm. This is the action-image — the sensory-motor circuit at maximum power, situation firing into act firing into new situation. The Coens stage it as a silent-comedy chase wired to a rock-and-roll tempo. And they organize it the way Deleuze describes the big action films breathing: an alternation he calls respiration-space, the camera pulling back to the vast sunbaked emptiness of the Arizona badlands and then snapping tight onto the taut line of the chase. Desert, then dash. The milieu inhales; the action strikes.

Then there is Leonard Smalls. The Lone Biker of the Apocalypse roars out of that same desert trailing fire, a tattooed bounty hunter who feels less like a plot device than a thing summoned. Here the film does something the action-image alone can't account for, and Deleuze's reflection-image — the Figure — explains it. Hi's guilt and dread are never simply felt by Cage and discharged into a deed; they are transposed into a figure, made flesh and given a motorcycle. Smalls is dread acted out as spectacle rather than emotion. He rides up from what Deleuze called the originary world: the savage underlayer that naturalism reveals seething beneath a tidy social surface. The tract houses and La-Z-Boys are the derived milieu; the badlands are the appetite underneath, and Smalls is its drive given a face. The film's governing visual idea — the domestic colliding with the apocalyptic — is exactly this geology of an originary world breaking through linoleum.

Listen to Hi narrate, too. The mock-biblical, Faulknerian cadence laid over a petty crook's life is what Deleuze meant by fabulation — a character caught in the act of legending himself, telling his own life into myth. The grandiloquent diction doesn't describe the trailer park; it tries to redeem it, and the gap between the scripture and the linoleum is where the film's tenderness lives.

And then, at the very end, the relentless forward motion finally stops moving and opens onto time. Hi falls asleep and dreams a future — families reunited, grandchildren, a vision he isn't sure belongs to him. This is the dream-image, the onirosign: a fantasy circuit untethered from any dated memory, floating free. After ninety minutes of pure propulsion, the one moment the movie reaches for something it cannot chase is its image of grace.

What did the Coens do here? They proved the movement-image could be played as music — that the screwball engine of Bringing Up Baby and the mock-heroic vernacular of Sturges's Sullivan's Travels could be welded to a horror camera and pushed to cartoon velocity without losing its heart. The kinetic, camera-as-projectile style they invented on this picture seeded a generation of American filmmaking, from Raimi's own later work to Sonnenfeld's directing career to the whole vocabulary of the swooping comic rush. Watch it again. Keep one eye on the camera nobody is holding, and notice the exact moment it stops running and starts to dream.

Concepts in play

Sightlines essays that trace this film

Critical essays that trace a line through this film and others.

More essays on Joel Coen’s films