← I Am Legend
I Am Legend poster

I Am Legend · essays & theory

2007 · Francis Lawrence

A reading · through the lens of theory

There's a clock in every daylight shot, even when you can't see one. Neville drives north up an empty Fifth Avenue in late afternoon, and the light is gorgeous — cool, clean, almost pleasurable — and the whole time you're watching the sun instead of the road. Sundown is a deadline. Andrew Lesnie photographs the abandoned city as something to be enjoyed and feared in the same frame, and the tension in those return-to-base drives comes from almost nothing you can point at: no creature, no chase, just time draining out of the day. That temporal pulse is the key to what the film is actually doing — and to why it can't quite decide what kind of film it wants to be.

Start with the city itself. Deleuze has a precise name for a space that has stopped being a setting for action: the any-space-whatever (espace quelconque) — a place drained of its coordinates, no longer a stage where a situation demands a deed. Overgrown Midtown, deer drifting through Times Square, a lion in the grass off a corner you recognize: this is a world that has lost the human center that used to organize it. The film's real achievement isn't the Dark Seekers (the CG creatures were already reading as unintegrated in 2007) — it's this. Actual New York light, actual pavement, streets closed for the camera at dawn, then extended into years of organic decay. That's why the emptiness convinces instead of decorating. It's a landscape that has quietly withdrawn from us.

When action falls away and a character can only look and listen, Deleuze says we've crossed out of the movement-image — where someone perceives a situation and acts to change it — into the time-image, built from pure optical and sound situations (opsigns and sonsigns). Watch Neville in the video store, arranging mannequins into a social tableau, rehearsing a good-morning to a plastic clerk. There is nothing here for him to act on. The city gives him images he can only absorb. The silence — no traffic, no voices, no machines — is itself a sound-image, and the Seekers are heard, clicking and echolocating, before they are ever seen. Threat arrives as a sonsign from an offscreen that can't be located. This is the film at its strangest and best.

And Neville is, in these stretches, what Deleuze calls a seer (voyant) — not an agent who resolves situations but a watcher who endures one. His days are dead time (temps mort): the hunt, the lab, the taped reruns of old morning news, the ritual arranged down to the minute. Will Smith has to hold a single sustained quality across long passages with no scene partner — this is the affection-image working as pure qualisign, a face expressing a state that never quite discharges into action. The performance is the film's whole structural bet.

Those routines are worth naming exactly. Deleuze's cinema of the body reads the everyday or ceremonial body as a carrier of duration, and the posture that exposes a relation he calls the gest. Neville's military discipline is a gest: he keeps saluting a mission that no longer has an object. And the radio broadcasts, the mannequins, the addressed emptiness — this is fabulation, a man legending a people into existence because his real situation is the one modern political cinema keeps circling: the people are missing. Here that's not a metaphor. The people are, literally, gone, and he talks to their effigies to keep the idea of address alive.

So here's the argument the concepts let us make. I Am Legend is built like a time-image and keeps flinching back into the movement-image. Deleuze's crisis of the action-image is exactly what befalls a character who can no longer respond adequately to what he perceives — and Neville's entire discipline is a refusal of that crisis. He re-imposes a sensory-motor circuit (hunt, experiment, fortify, patrol) onto a world that has stopped offering him situations to act in. Then, in the third act, the film does the same thing its hero does: it accelerates into genre action, restores the binomial of force against force, hands him an enemy and a last stand. Critics felt that as a seam. Deleuze names what the seam is — a film that discovered a seer and couldn't sustain him, so it manufactured an agent.

The lineage makes the craft debts concrete. The three-beat day — daylit foraging, lab work, barricaded night — comes almost intact from The Last Man on Earth (1964); the lone immune man driving deserted streets, car as mobile safe zone, from The Omega Man; the fortified domestic threshold, UV barriers standing in for boarded windows, from Night of the Living Dead; the solo behavioral-accumulation performance from Cast Away; the pre-dawn shooting of a real emptied metropolis, and the fast deranged infected, from 28 Days Later. Lesnie was hired off Fellowship of the Ring precisely to fold CGI bodies into location light — the Gollum pipeline, repurposed.

What did it do to film? It proved a studio blockbuster could spend two acts in a near-plotless, pure-optical register and hold an audience on emptiness and a face. The perfected image of the reclaimed city seeded a decade of apocalypse. But its deepest interest is as a case study in the gravitational pull of Deleuze's two regimes — how hard the movement-image fights to reassert itself the moment a film wanders into real duration. Rewatch it once and don't watch Neville. Watch the sun.

Concepts in play