← Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood
Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood poster

Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood · essays & theory

2019 · Quentin Tarantino

A reading · through the lens of theory

Sharon Tate buys a ticket to her own movie. The girl at the Westwood box office doesn't recognize her, so she points at the poster — that's me — and goes in, props her bare feet on the seat ahead, and watches the audience watch her. When they laugh, she laughs. Then Tarantino cuts to the real footage: Margot Robbie is looking up at the actual Sharon Tate, the dead woman who is also the character she's playing. Nothing happens in this scene. It is one of the most beautiful in the film, and once you've seen what it's doing, the whole movie reorganizes around it.

Deleuze had a name for an image like this. He called it a pure optical situation — an opsign. Something has loosened the old machinery where a character sees a problem and acts to fix it; instead a person simply looks, and we look with her, and the looking is the event. Sharon can't do anything here. She can only sit in the dark and feel the strange tenderness of being witnessed. That's the whole grammar of the film. Cliff drives across Hollywood for no reason the plot requires. Rick sits in his trailer and weeps after a scene with a child actress, undone by the discovery that he can still do the work. These are what Deleuze called temps mort — dead time, the everyday held open instead of cut away — and the men who live in it are voyants, seers, watchers rather than agents. Cliff's long drift out to the Spahn Ranch is the purest case: the trip that transforms nothing, the balade, dread accumulating in a man who declines to register it. For two and a half hours Tarantino, the most kinetic director alive, makes a movie about people who mostly watch.

And then he breaks the contract. André Bazin built a whole theory of cinema on the idea that the camera doesn't lie — that film's gift is its fidelity to what was really there. Tarantino takes that gift and forges with it. The title told you he would. Once Upon a Time is not how you begin a history; it's how you begin a tale, and Deleuze borrowed a word from Bergson for exactly this — fabulation, the act of legending, of a people or a person caught telling a story about themselves. The film catches Hollywood in the act of legending its own golden age: the redressed Sunset Strip, the 35mm grain standing in for memory, the KHJ radio playing continuously off Cliff's truck dashboard so that an entire vanished 1969 reassembles itself out of pop songs. None of it is the real Los Angeles. All of it composes a Los Angeles and then quietly replaces the real one — what Deleuze called a crystalline description, an image so complete it stands in for the object it invented.

The forgery turns ethical in the last twenty minutes. We know what happened on Cielo Drive on the night of August 8, 1969. The film knows we know. And it sends the killers up the wrong driveway, into Rick Dalton's house, where Cliff and a flamethrower and a dog dismantle them, and Sharon Tate lives. This is the power of the false at full strength — not a lie, but time used as a creative force, the past made newly possible. Deleuze, late in his cinema books, called the deepest version of this a genesign: time itself as the productive power of the new. Two Augusts now coexist and neither cancels the other. You leave the theater holding both — the one that happened and the one the film willed into being — and the second feels less like a cheat than like a wish so fierce it earned its keep. The film had been teaching you to want it the whole time, in every quiet shot of Sharon dancing.

The lineage is worn openly, the way Tarantino wears everything. The title bows to Leone, who insisted the Western was mythology and not documentation, and to Once Upon a Time in America, where Leone first used a counterfactual dream-ending to rewrite a trauma into something bearable. The peripatetic camera trailing Cliff with no dramatic urgency is Altman's The Long Goodbye; the diegetic records carrying the feeling that a composed score would have carried is Altman's McCabe and Lucas's American Graffiti, where Wolfman Jack's broadcast first turned AM radio into a time machine. The elegiac hangout that detonates into sudden ultraviolence is Peckinpah's Wild Bunch — men whose world has outpaced them, granted one last burst of competence.

There's one more thing worth watching for. DiCaprio isn't playing an actor; he's playing a man performing a character who is always performing, with a hairline crack between the registers where the real grief leaks through. Deleuze would call that crack a gest — a posture that exposes the theatrical relation underneath a life. Rick Dalton's whole body is a piece of obsolete craft, and the film loves it for refusing to die well.

Watch it again, and watch the watchers. Tarantino's argument is that cinema's oldest cheat — its power to falsify — is also its power to console: to take a real night that ended in blood and, just once, tell it differently.

Concepts in play

Sightlines essays that trace this film

Critical essays that trace a line through this film and others.

More essays on Quentin Tarantino’s films