← Spider-Man: Far From Home
Spider-Man: Far From Home poster

Spider-Man: Far From Home · essays & theory

2019 · Jon Watts

A reading · through the lens of theory

The first time you see Mysterio he is backlit and caped, standing in smoke above a Venice canal while something enormous comes apart behind him. The shot is gorgeous and completely ordinary. Hero enters, hero is framed as hero, we relax. It is the most conventional composition in the film, and it is the film's central lie. You didn't meet a man. You read a graphic and filled in a man.

That is Jon Watts's real invention here, and it is sharper than the genre usually permits. Quentin Beck's weapon is not a beam or a fist. It's coverage. His crew are disgruntled ex-Stark engineers flying drones that project monsters, which makes him a bitter visual-effects supervisor staging a blockbuster in order to defraud the world. The film hands its antagonist its own toolkit. Every craft used to make the Elementals is the craft Beck uses to sell them.

Deleuze splits cinema in two, and this movie sits right on the seam. In the first regime, the movement-image, a character perceives a situation and acts, and the act changes the situation. See, feel, hit, resolve. Spider-Man may be the purest movement-image body in the whole genre: a design for converting sight into motion, where a swing is just a perception with momentum attached. The action-image is his native element.

Then Beck gets inside his head and the circuit snaps. In the psychic-assault sequence, Peter's powers keep working and stop meaning anything. He punches images. He lands on a floor that becomes a sky. Lebental and Folsom Boyd cut so that one false reality dissolves into the next before you can find footing, and the sound design pulls the ground out with it. Deleuze has a name for what Peter has been reduced to: a pure optical situation, an opsign, where a person can only look because nothing available to do will touch what he's seeing. This is also a dream-image in Deleuze's strict sense, a circuit of the unreal not anchored to any memory you could date. And it is what he calls a perfect crystal: an enclosed world of reflections with no outside, where the actual and its double can no longer be separated. Beck built a crystal out of drones.

This is where the Deleuzian lens earns its keep, because it explains why that sequence feels different in kind from everything around it. Deleuze's late idea is the powers of the false, and it isn't a moral complaint about lying. It's the claim that modern cinema's most productive figure is the forger, the one who makes truth instead of reporting it. Beck arrives with a story that explains everything, and the story manufactures its own evidence. The Elementals are what Deleuze calls a crystalline description: an image that composes its object and then stands in the object's place. There is no monster that the hologram is a picture of. Put this against Bazin, who argued that photography carries a unique credibility because the world prints itself onto the film with no human hand in between. That contract is the deep reason we trust a shot at all. Far From Home is a movie about the contract expiring. Beck's images are made purely of intention, and Fury believes them, the news believes them, we believe them.

The falsification doesn't stop at the plot. The film closes on two stingers that reach back and falsify the movie you just watched: Jameson's broadcast releases doctored footage that turns Peter into a murderer, and the Fury who recruited him is revealed to have been a Skrull the whole time. Mutually exclusive versions, both left standing. That is falsifying narration, and it is aimed at us rather than at a character.

What Peter has to learn is how to read. Deleuze's lectosign is an image that has lost its sensory-motor obviousness and has to be deciphered instead of reacted to, and EDITH literalizes it: eyewear you look through in order to annotate the world. The film also runs a small clinic in habit. A backlit cape is a mark, an object that means by custom, the way a raised gun means a shot. Watts stages Beck that way on purpose so the reveal turns the mark into a demark, the anomaly that breaks the habit and forces interpretation. J.K. Simmons's single scene is the same mechanism used warmly: a performance built entirely on your recognizing him from 2002.

And there's a political edge. Deleuze's fabulation describes a missing people inventing itself through story-telling. Beck runs it in reverse. One man legends himself and fabricates a public to receive it, feeding a crowd a threat and a savior in the same broadcast. For a summer tentpole in 2019, that is an unusually exact diagram of disinformation.

The craft debts are specific. The Wizard of Oz supplies the load-bearing device: the booming projected giant exposed as a small man at the controls, curtain swapped for a drone fleet. Wag the Dog contributes the hidden production team manufacturing events for public consumption. Total Recall supplies the unreliable frame in which neither hero nor audience can verify which layer is real. North by Northwest gives the innocent-abroad scaffold where tourism, romance, and espionage ride the same itinerary, and Ferris Bueller's Day Off gives Watts his tonal calibration, holding teen longing above the spectacle instead of under it. The nightmare sequence descends directly from Raimi's expressionist hospital massacre in Spider-Man 2, and Simmons's return folds that trilogy into the MCU's usable past.

What it did afterward is mostly structural. It ends by detonating the secret identity, the oldest engine the character has, using a piece of edited video. A franchise that runs on continuity discovered it could weaponize the cut. Offscreen the same lesson repeated: the film passed a billion dollars and the Sony–Disney split then nearly removed the character from the universe he'd just closed out, a fight over who controls an image.

Be honest about the limit. The film opens the door to the time-image and then shuts it, because the finale needs Peter's sensory-motor circuit back online to satisfy. He beats the drones. Watch it again anyway, starting at the Venice arrival, and keep asking one question of every shot: who is this framed for? He can out-fight the drones. He can't out-fight the edit.

Concepts in play