← 1900
1900 poster

1900 · reception & legacy

1976 · Bernardo Bertolucci

How 1900 has been received, argued over, and remembered.

The arc

In 1976 it was a scandal of scale — a five-hour Marxist epic bankrolled by Hollywood money, hacked down for American release after a bitter fight between Bertolucci and the studio, and critics were split between 'monumental' and 'bloated'. The restored full-length version has since been reappraised as one of the great mad epics of the '70s, with Storaro's cinematography and Morricone's score now beyond dispute.

What's debated

The eternal 1900 debate: majestic masterpiece or magnificent folly — and can a lavish, star-studded, studio-financed film credibly preach communist revolution?

Its footprint

It survives as the ultimate 'commitment watch' — the five-hour Bertolucci — and its images of red banners sweeping across the Emilian countryside are among the most reproduced in political cinema. The sheer cast (De Niro, Depardieu, Lancaster, Sutherland, Hayden) makes it a perennial 'wait, THEY'RE all in this?' discovery.

Where it stands

A cinephile endurance badge and canon climber — less watched than Last Tango or The Conformist, but the one whose completion earns you Letterboxd bragging rights.

★ Did you know? The film was so expensive that three rival Hollywood studios — Paramount, United Artists, and 20th Century Fox — jointly financed it, an almost unheard-of arrangement, effectively making American studio money pay for a five-hour epic about Italian communism.