← House
House poster

House · essays & theory

1977 · Nobuhiko Obayashi

A reading · through the lens of theory

The sky is painted. Not filtered, not stylized: painted, on a flat, with clouds banked in an orange no evening ever made. Obayashi doesn't hide it for a second. The first time a girl stands against that sky, a contract gets signed. Nothing here will pretend to have been found in the world. All of it was made. Getting that admission out of the way early is what buys the film everything that follows.

Toho asked for a Japanese Jaws. Think about what that request assumes: a threat, people who perceive the threat, a boat, a plan, a decision. It runs on a circuit. See the situation, act on it, and the acting settles it. Obayashi took the assignment and went to ask his young daughter Chigumi what frightened her. Children don't report plan-shaped fears. They report images. He built the film out of those and shot it in the grammar he actually had, from experimental film and television advertising: stop-substitution, iris wipes, crude animation, mattes stacked on mattes, a piano score that curdles mid-lullaby.

Deleuze has a name for description that behaves like that painted sky. He calls it crystalline. Ordinary realist description points at something the camera assumes was already standing there. The room existed, the lens found it, and if you cut away the room stays put. Deleuze calls that organic description, and it underwrites nearly all horror: the house has a floor plan, so the thing in the house has somewhere to be. A crystalline description does something else. It constitutes its object and then replaces it. There is no room behind the shot to check the shot against, and the next image may cancel this one and hand you a different world instead.

That distinction is worth insisting on, because the usual defense of House is "it's gloriously insane, just go with it," which is a shrug wearing a compliment's clothes. Crystalline description says the insanity is load-bearing. Obayashi isn't decorating a haunted-house story with effects. He has removed the stable object that a haunted-house story needs, and the effects are what stands in its place. This is also the film's real move on narrative: horror's engine shifts from what might happen to what the image might do next. Suspense normally lives on withheld information. Here it lives on transformation, and you genuinely cannot predict the next image, because nothing anchors it.

Then the girls stop acting. Deleuze noticed a strange thing in musicals: at a certain point the dancer stops initiating the dance and the dance takes her over, and motion migrates out of the character and into the world. He called it the movement of world. House runs that as horror. Seven visitors arrive as tourists in someone else's summer, and one by one they cease to be the ones who do things. The house does. It begins expressing opinions. Perceiving no longer leads anywhere, because the milieu has confiscated the capacity to act, and what's left for the girls is to undergo. That is precisely the film Toho did not order.

The names give it away in advance. Gorgeous, Kung Fu, Melody. These aren't thin characters. They're what Deleuze calls quality-powers: a quality expressed for itself, glowing on its own, before it gets embodied in any particular person or state of affairs. Kung Fu is not a girl who knows kung fu so much as kung fu given legs and a school uniform. The film's cruelty is watching a pure quality walk into a house that has plans for it.

Colour does the work that shadow does in expressionism. The German tradition charged objects with a life that wasn't organic, a non-human vitality in staircases and shadows, and it got there by gradient of light and dark. Obayashi gets there by gel. A colour comes down over a scene and absorbs it, so that the room is no longer lit red, the room simply is red, feeling and all. The score joins in: a lullaby souring in real time is the same operation performed on sound. And the space keeps refusing to add up. Collaged mattes and superimpositions chop the mansion into affective fragments that no floor plan could reconcile. Try to draw the house after watching it. You can't, and that isn't sloppiness. A dream doesn't have a floor plan either, and Deleuze's onirosign, the dream-image, names exactly this: circuits of fantasy that never resolve into anybody's rememberable memory.

Which is where the candy box turns out to have something in it. Obayashi was raised in Hiroshima, and his whole career circled that wound. The film is about aging and mortality and a woman in the countryside who did not move on. The pop surface isn't a denial of that grief. It's the container that let the grief travel, into a theatre full of teenagers who came for the effects.

Every debt he owes is to somebody who refused the photograph. Méliès gave him the in-camera trick grammar: the stop-substitution splice, the frankly hand-painted flat. Cocteau's The Blood of a Poet showed dream logic could be constructed out of reverse motion and mirror passages instead of psychology. Fellini's Juliet of the Spirits made saturated storybook colour into an interior turned outward. Bava's Kill, Baby... Kill! supplied the gel-lit gothic room that looks lit by fever rather than by lamps. Suzuki's Tokyo Drifter, closer to home, treated the frame as a graphic-design surface where colour can just change. Anger's Inauguration of the Pleasure Dome modeled the dense superimposition collage. Obayashi's invention was to run all of it at once, at children's-television speed, inside a commercial genre picture.

Forward, the honest report is that it founded nothing. Japanese critics shrugged in 1977 while the young audience showed up anyway; three decades later a Janus tour and a Criterion release made it a beloved object abroad. Nobody has really imitated it, because the maximalism isn't a style you can adopt in pieces. Its influence runs through viewers rather than through films, and its significance is the kind a proof has rather than the kind a template has. It demonstrates that horror doesn't require plausibility. It requires conviction in the image, and Obayashi's conviction is total.

So watch for two things. The sky, first, and how early the film tells you it is a made thing. Then the moment each girl stops deciding, and the house takes over the verb.

Concepts in play