Sightlines · a reading

A Deleuzian reading of The Woman in the Window

1944 · Fritz Lang · The Woman in the Window on Sightlines

A man has dinner at his club. His wife and children are away for the summer, so there is nothing waiting at home. On the walk back he stops at a shop window to look at a painting of a woman, the way he has stopped to look at it before. Then her reflection appears in the glass beside the portrait, because she is standing behind him, and she is real.

Hold that pane of glass. It carries two things in the same rectangle at the same instant: an image of a woman, and a woman. For a second it will not tell you which one you are looking at. Everything The Woman in the Window does from there is already sitting in it.

Deleuze had a name for a shot that behaves this way. He called it the crystal-image: the actual thing and its double — a reflection, a memory, a dream, a painted copy — folded so tightly together that you can no longer say which came first. And he had a finer term for the case where the crystal starts from one small point and grows outward. He called it a crystal-seed: drop a single grain into the right solution and a whole structure assembles itself around it. Milton Krasner's camera gives Lang that grain, and Lang lets it work. Richard Wanley, a criminology professor played by Edward G. Robinson at his least theatrical, looks at an image. The image acquires a body. The body acquires an apartment. The apartment acquires a dead man on the floor, and before the night is over a respectable academic is disposing of a body. Nobody planned any of it. It took one pane of glass and one evening Off Guard, which was the title of the J. H. Wallis novel Lang was adapting and is a better description of the film than its plot is.

You have probably heard how it ends. The whole ordeal turns out to be a dream; Wanley wakes in his club chair, unharmed, guilty of nothing. The complaint is as old as the film. A cheat. A betrayal of the dread it spent the whole film accumulating. Lang argued back, in interviews with Peter Bogdanovich years later, that the choice was his and not the studio's, and that the honest alternative was ending on the professor's suicide, which he would not do.

Deleuze gives you a way to take that ending seriously without pretending it doesn't sting. Movies run on a contract nobody signs: what you were shown, happened. That contract is why the twist hurts. Deleuze's term for breaking it on purpose is the powers of the false — not a gotcha, but making truth and falsity undecidable as a working principle, because the undecidable can carry something a settled truth can't. The Production Code of 1944 required that crime, adultery and suicide not go unpunished on screen. Lang's dream obeys that rule to the letter and empties it at the same time. And look where the dream comes from. The machine that destroys Wanley is assembled entirely out of what Wanley knows. The footprint, the scratch, the bloodstain, the monogrammed pencil: he can identify every one of them as evidence, and that expertise is precisely what makes each one unbearable. The onirosign, the dream-image, is Deleuze's word for a circuit like this one — a fantasy that isn't a flashback to anything, that answers to no event you can date. Wanley's dream doesn't come from outside him. It's his syllabus.

That also makes the last minute something better than an escape hatch. Deleuze distinguishes the sealed crystal, the mirrored world with no outside, from the cracked crystal, the one with a fissure in it that something can slip through. Lang builds the sealed version reel by reel — an apartment, a club, a study, the geometry closing — and then cracks it. The crack is the way out, and it is also the reminder that a way out existed only because none of it was true.

The craft under this is unshowy and merciless. Lang stages in a handful of interiors and traps people with doorways, staircases and telephones, holding the frame still or letting it reframe slowly so you stay locked inside Robinson's deteriorating composure. Ordinary props do the killing: scissors, a wristwatch, that pencil. Deleuze calls objects like these marks, things that signify through the customary chain they belong to. See a monogrammed pencil in a Lang film and you already know its future. What's diabolical here is that he hands the marks to a man who reads marks professionally, and then hands the investigation to Wanley's friend, the district attorney played by Raymond Massey, so that the apparatus of justice arrives in the shape of a friend. Dan Duryea's blackmailer supplies the sneer. The rest is a slope. Deleuze's line of slope is the irreversible downward grade of an entropic world, and Lang had been drawing it since Weimar.

The lineage is unusually legible. Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari (1920) supplies the retroactive frame, a whole tale exposed at the end as a mind's fabrication. Dr. Mabuse, der Spieler (1922) supplies crime as a deterministic machine and the light-and-shadow grammar Deleuze filed under expressionism, where shadow is a gradient and objects carry a non-organic life of their own. Sunrise (1927) supplies the respectable man lured toward murder by a beautiful stranger. M (1931) supplies the geometry and the object-as-fate, the balloon and the whistle. Fury (1936) and You Only Live Once (1937) are where Lang first transplanted Weimar fatalism into American material and found it grew.

Lang's specific invention is the naturalization. In Caligari the machine was visible in the painted sets; here it's a club chair, a taxi, a chat with a friend. Fate stops looking like style and starts looking like a Tuesday. That is what noir inherited, and Lang proved it immediately by making Scarlet Street the following year with the same three actors, the same mild man wrecked by desire, and no waking up.

Watch it again and count how often Lang puts glass between a man and what he wants. Then ask the question the argument about the ending keeps skipping. Not whether the dream is a cheat, but whether waking is a reprieve or a diagnosis. Wanley did not dream a random catastrophe. He dreamed the one he was qualified to build.

Concepts in play

  • crystal-seed (formation) — The shop-window portrait and the woman's reflection appearing in the same glass: an image that becomes a person and then a snare. Krasner's compositional use of the window, mirrors and the recurring framed portrait makes one small virtual point the germ the whole film grows from.
  • dream-image (onirosign) — The ending reveals the entire ordeal as Wanley's dream in the club chair — a fantasy circuit anchored to no datable event, assembled out of the criminologist's own expertise (footprint, scratch, bloodstain, monogrammed pencil).
  • powers of the false (puissances du faux) — The dream-reveal makes everything that came before it formally undecidable and has divided critics ever since; Lang defended it to Bogdanovich as an authorial choice, and it satisfies the Production Code's demand that crime be punished while voiding it.
  • cracked crystal — Lang seals the world — club, apartment, study, geometric staging, the alternative ending being the professor's suicide — then opens a fissure in the last reel through which Wanley escapes the totality entirely.
  • expressionism — Krasner's low-key lighting, pooled illumination and shadow-heavy interiors that express the encroaching threat more than any action does — the Mabuse/Caligari light-and-shadow grammar naturalized into an American idiom.
  • mark — Everyday props staged as instruments of fate: a pair of scissors, a monogrammed pencil, a wristwatch, plus the footprint, scratch and bloodstain the professor can identify as evidence because reading such chains is his profession.
  • line of slope (entropy / degradation) — The 'slow tightening of consequence' from a single lapse through homicide and blackmail toward the suicide ending Lang said he refused — the inexorable mechanism the noir cycle runs on.
  • mind-game film — The notorious twist that retroactively reframes the entire narrative and rewards re-viewing, inherited from Caligari's framing device and handed forward as the twist-ending strain of the noir cycle.

How The Woman in the Window was received →