Sightlines · reception

How The Conjuring was received

2013 · James Wan · The Conjuring on Sightlines

The arc

A rare horror film that was a critical and box-office smash on arrival — $300M+ on a $20M budget — and a decade on it's only grown in stature as the film that made classical, jump-scare-craftsman horror respectable again and accidentally birthed cinema's biggest horror franchise.

What’s debated

The evergreen fight: is it a masterclass in old-school scare craft or slick jump-scare machinery — and can you love it while side-eyeing its reverent, 'based on a true story' portrait of Ed and Lorraine Warren, whom many consider frauds?

Its footprint

The hide-and-clap game entered the horror lexicon instantly, and the creepy Annabelle doll became so iconic she spun off her own films — the whole 'Conjuring Universe' turned haunted-house horror into franchise architecture that every studio has since tried to copy.

Where it stands

Firmly in the modern horror canon — the consensus 'best mainstream horror of the 2010s' pick and a gateway film for a whole generation of horror fans.

Did you know? The film's producers said the MPAA gave it an R rating not for gore, sex, or language, but simply for being too scary — they were reportedly told there was nothing they could cut to get a PG-13.

Named by the director

  • The Exorcist (1973) — Wan repeatedly named it as the gold standard for the grounded 1970s supernatural horror tone he was chasing.
  • The Amityville Horror (1979) — Wan cited the classic 70s haunted-house/'true case' films like Amityville as the template for the Warrens' world.
  • The Haunting (1963) — Wan pointed to Robert Wise's film as a model for scares built on suggestion and what you don't see.

A Deleuzian reading of The Conjuring →