← Sirāt
Sirāt poster

Sirāt · essays & theory

2025 · Oliver Laxe

A reading · through the lens of theory

A father holds out a photograph. His daughter's face, printed on a flyer, passed hand to hand through a crowd dancing in the Moroccan dust. Mar vanished at a rave months ago; Luis has come to another one, with his teenage son, to ask if anyone has seen her. That gesture — the offered picture, the eyes scanning faces — is the whole engine of the film's first movement. It's worth naming what kind of gesture it is, because Oliver Laxe is about to take it away from him.

The flyer is a clue to a situation we never see: the earlier party, the disappearance, Mar herself. Deleuze had a name for the small elliptical sign that points to an absent whole — the index. And the story it drives is what he called the action-image in its small form: not a hero remaking the world, but a man following a thread, acting so that the hidden truth will surface. Distribute the flyer, watch the crowd, follow the convoy — each act is a wager that looking will find. The missing-person search and the road movie both run on this contract. Acts lead somewhere. That is the ordinary faith of most cinema, the sensory-motor circuit at full tension: you perceive a situation, you decide, you act, the situation changes.

Then a van rolls off a cliff, and the film breaks in half.

Deleuze located a specific rupture in postwar cinema — the crisis of the action-image — the moment films stopped believing that what a character does can answer what a character sees. Laxe stages it as literal catastrophe. After the fall, people die without warning, without the cues that tell us tragedy is coming. Cristóbal Fernández's editing withholds the usual build-up precisely so that the circuit snaps: the characters still perceive, sharply, constantly — but nothing they do is adequate to it. The convoy across the desert becomes a voyage in the exact sense Deleuze meant — a trip that transforms nothing, that no longer arrives anywhere the will can steer.

Watch what the minefield does. The ground, Mauro Herce's camera insists, looks like any other ground. There is no threat to read in the image, no villain to fight, no correct action to take. You can only look, listen, and step. This is what Deleuze called a pure optical and sound situation — an opsign, a sonsign — an image that has shed its motor prolongation, that offers nothing to do. And so Luis stops being an agent and becomes a seer (voyant): a watcher, an endurer. Sergi López plays him almost without dialogue, grief carried in the body, in the stillness of a man who has run out of acts. The performance is the concept.

The desert makes this legible at the scale of geography. Herce alternates vast depopulated wides — the convoy reduced to specks against the ridgelines — with jolting handheld inside the vans. Those emptied plains are an any-space-whatever: not a setting for action but a void, an in-between, the ground of pure affect. It descends visibly from Antonioni's Zabriskie Point and the North African nothing of The Passenger, where identity dissolves into long depopulated takes. But Laxe pushes past emptiness into something more savage — an originary world, a milieu that strips the social down to appetite, drive, entropy. The film advances by subtraction: people, vehicles, certainty, all removed one by one. That is a line of slope — the irreversible downward tilt toward exhaustion and death that Deleuze read in naturalist cinema. Each death reframes what kind of film we are in, until only sand, sky, and a handful of survivors remain.

Sound is where the time-image becomes physical. Kangding Ray's techno is not a soundtrack laid over the picture; it is, as the production understood, the film's nervous system — a continuous sub-bass pressure the characters live inside and the audience is made to endure. This is the lineage of Sorcerer, whose Tangerine Dream drones bound a doomed convoy to abstract dread, and of The Wages of Fear before it, which built terror from physical obstacles on a lethal road. From Mad Max: Fury Road Laxe borrows the cut-to-the-beat lock of image to percussion across a single line of desert motion. What he adds is the refusal — Fury Road resolves; Sirāt will not.

That refusal is the film's argument. The search-story promises the lost will be found, that suffering redeems. Laxe voids the contract, and in voiding it he makes a 2025 film — festival-strange but blockbuster-loud — that enacts, in the body, the exact break Deleuze traced from Bazin's neorealists onward: the passage from a cinema of action to a cinema of time endured. The title names it. As-Sirāt is the bridge over hell, thinner than a hair, that the dead must cross. It is never in the frame. It is the absolute out-of-field — the whole beyond the image that no camera can locate, only invoke. The film keeps gesturing at it and never delivers arrival.

So rewatch the minefield, and notice what Laxe has done to your eyes. He has made you a seer too. You scan the ground for a threat that isn't visible, you can't act, you can only endure the sound. That is the time-image, and you are standing in it.

Concepts in play

Sightlines essays that trace this film

Critical essays that trace a line through this film and others.