← A Single Man
A Single Man poster

A Single Man · essays & theory

2009 · Tom Ford

A reading · through the lens of theory

The suit is laid out on the bed, cufflinks beside it, and a note. The note specifies the knot.

George Falconer has spent part of what he intends to be his last morning writing instructions for how his body should be dressed, down to the knot in his tie. This is not fussiness. A life conducted partly in secret gets built out of surfaces that hold, and when the man you built it with is gone, the surfaces are the only structure still standing.

What has happened to George, in the terms cinema uses, is that a circuit has been cut. Most films run on one engine: someone perceives a situation, acts on it, and the act changes the situation. Deleuze called that the movement-image, and it is less a style than the default physics of narrative film. Perception exists to feed action. After the war, films began appearing where the feed failed. A character sees something and nothing follows, because nothing can. Deleuze named those moments pure optical and sound situations, and the person stranded inside one a voyant: a seer, someone who can only look and listen.

Ford builds an entire day out of them, and the proof is in the sound rather than the plot. His stated conceit is that a man close to death perceives with unbearable acuity, and the mix executes it literally. Ambient noise narrows to a clock, a pen moving on paper, the click of a lighter, a sprinkler somewhere down the block. Everything else drops away. That is what a severed sensory-motor circuit sounds like. Perception swells precisely because it has nowhere to discharge. The pen is loud because the day has nothing else to do.

Worth insisting on, because the standing objection to this film is that its grammar is the grammar of the campaign image, and that gorgeous surface is standing in for grief rather than carrying it. The objection is fair, and this is the strongest answer to it. Ford is not decorating a story about mourning. He is filming what perception does when action is unavailable: it goes fine-grained, greedy, over-lit. The nape of a neck at that magnification is not a fashion choice. It is a symptom.

Deleuze's word for a feeling that registers without discharging into anything is the affection-image, and its home is the close-up. Firth supplies the version Deleuze calls a reflecting face, nearly immobile, holding one sustained quality instead of a sequence of reactions. Around it, Eduard Grau's camera keeps finding eyes, mouths, hands, held past any narrative need. The beheld bodies work the same way. George watching Kenny, or the tennis players, is Visconti's shot-logic from Death in Venice imported whole: the held look at a young man cut against a dying man inspecting himself. Beauty apprehended as a symptom of mortality. In a movement-image film, noticing a beautiful stranger is setup. Here it is the entire event, and nothing follows from it, which is why it stings.

Then the color moves. Ford and Grau graded the film so that saturation tracks George's proximity to being alive: a drained, faintly sickly baseline, and when something reaches him, skin warms and reds and greens come up. The ancestor is exact. Russell Metty lit All That Heaven Allows so that gelled color shifted with a woman's feeling, because 1955 melodrama would not let her say it aloud. Deleuze's term for a color that absorbs a scene and its feeling instead of describing an object is the colour-image. Ford's advance on Sirk is a matter of where the change happens: not between setups but continuously, inside a single take, so it reads as physiology rather than scheme. The weather in this film is George's bloodstream.

The editing does something rarer. Jim arrives in fragments, sometimes a few frames, sometimes a long scene on a sofa with two fox terriers, and Joan Sobel cuts them in with no dissolve, no optical, no cushioning at all. Present and past share one grammar. Ordinary flashback is what Deleuze calls a recollection-image, a dated card announcing that this happened before, with the present still running the sentence. Strip the markers and the past stops being a subordinate clause and becomes a region you are standing in. Deleuze called these sheets of past and found them in Resnais. The debt is direct: Henri Colpi's one-second flashes of the dead lover in Hiroshima mon amour, spliced straight into present action. Early grief works this way, which is why the device reads as accuracy instead of technique.

The underwater refrain gives the condition a picture. A body suspended, hair drifting, sound gone thick. Deleuze has a name for the shot where the figure goes still and the world does the moving: movement of world. George does not swim. The water carries him. The extreme close-up of the eye, and the drowned imagery around it, come off the drain in Psycho, lifted without embarrassment.

The day itself is a stroll that transforms nothing. Bank, classroom, parking lot, Charley's overdecorated smoke-filled house, the one interior the film permits to be a mess and the one place the ordering breaks. The structural template is Le Feu Follet, where Malle filmed a suicide as an itinerary: methodical undramatized preparations, farewell calls on friends who do not know they are farewells, the gun handled as a prop among props. Ford inherits the deadpan. The rehearsal sequence, George hunting for a position in which to shoot himself and finally zipping himself into a sleeping bag, is the only comedy in the film, and it is funny for a structural reason. The act has been drained of dramatic charge and reduced to a problem of posture.

The event that organizes all of this never becomes an image. Jim's death arrives as a voice on a telephone, Jon Hamm, uncredited, a stranger being politely careful, explaining that the funeral is for family only. That clause is the wound. There is a place where the death is being acknowledged and George is not allowed to be in it. Deleuze separates the out-of-field that is merely the next room from the absolute out-of-field, a beyond that cannot be located in space at all. George's exclusion is that kind, and so, at civic scale, is the missile crisis muttering from every radio: a public rehearsal of extinction that nobody in frame can act on either.

Abel Korzeniowski's score is built from Herrmann, string-led, cycling figures that rise and never cadence. Vertigo is the model, another film about a man organized entirely around an absent body. Music that refuses to resolve is the acoustic equivalent of an action that cannot complete: time offered as itself rather than as the measure of movement toward something.

What Ford put into the discourse is narrower and more durable than the film's reputation suggests. He made the digital intermediate an instrument of performance. Shot on 35mm, lit and exposed so the grade could swing hard both ways without breaking, color becomes a continuous emotional variable instead of a palette. That was the fashion image's technology, and a man who had spent a decade making surfaces carry feeling for a living was the one positioned to import it. Three weeks, roughly seven million dollars, his own money, final cut.

The open question is whose color it is. When the world floods warm as Kenny leans in, are we inside George's perception, or watching Ford grieve on his behalf? The film never settles it, and that is why it stays interesting after the surface stops being novel.

Watch it again for the drain rather than the flood. The moments when the color goes cold are the film's real clock, counting how long a man can keep receiving a world he has already decided to leave.

Concepts in play