Sightlines · a reading

A Deleuzian reading of Hangmen Also Die!

1943 · Fritz Lang · Hangmen Also Die! on Sightlines

Watch what the lamps do. James Wong Howe pools light on a table and lets the room go black just past the sitter's shoulder, so that an interrogation in Hangmen Also Die! is lit the way a cell is lit: not to show you the room but to take it away from the man in the chair. Prague here was built on soundstages, and you can feel it. A city of doorways, staircases and hard shadow, assembled rather than photographed. That turns out to be exactly the right kind of fake.

Now watch Alexander Granach as Inspector Gruber. He is almost funny. Oily, chatty, pleased with himself, a man doing a job he finds genuinely interesting — and the comedy of his manner is what makes the cruelty land. Deleuze has a name for what Granach is doing, and he took it from someone in this film's credits. Brecht called it Gestus; Deleuze calls it the gest: a posture or attitude that exposes a social relation, so that you read the relation instead of the man. Gruber's affability isn't character shading. It's the occupation, performed as office manners. The term earns its keep because it stops you asking whether Gruber is a sadist, which is a boring question, and starts you asking what a state does once it hands cruelty to people who are good at paperwork.

The style around him is inherited, and Lang knows it. The shadow-gradient comes out of Caligari, where menace lived in painted sets and thrown darkness rather than in anybody's face. Deleuze calls this expressionism and means something fairly precise: light and dark treated as a life of their own, running through objects, indifferent to persons. And from his own Testament of Dr. Mabuse Lang brings a power that watches from outside the frame and can't be pointed at. Not the next room. Nowhere in particular. Deleuze's term for that is the absolute out-of-field, the sense of something past the edges with no location. In occupied Prague it isn't a mood. It's the Gestapo.

Then the film does the thing it was made to do. The Nazis seize hundreds of Czech hostages and shoot them in batches, on a schedule, until the assassin surrenders. Lang stages them so fate arrives collectively: ranks of men, and an arithmetic running under every scene of private escape. Deleuze's word for a crowd rendered as one feeling body rather than a sum of persons is the dividual. Ugly word, beautiful staging. Individual guilt dissolves into shared jeopardy, and once it dissolves, nobody in the picture gets to stay innocent by staying out of it. This is Lang's specific invention here: the hostage count is the clock. Every hour Svoboda stays free is priced, publicly, in other people's lives.

Structurally this is Deleuze's movement-image running at full power, in what he calls the large form: an encompassing situation presses until somebody acts decisively enough to change it. The occupation is the encompasser — Deleuze's synsign, the milieu that calls action out of whoever is standing in it — and the film sets force against force, Gruber's apparatus against the underground, in the straight binomial the action genre lives on. Nothing here hesitates. Perception leads to action and action alters the situation, which is precisely the machinery that stops working in European cinema after 1945.

But the film does something the genre doesn't require. Lang cross-cuts so the audience always holds more of the case than anyone inside it. You know who did it, who's lying, where the danger is standing, while people on screen grope. Deleuze calls this level the relation-image: meaning that lives in no single shot, only in relations the viewer holds. He credits Hitchcock with putting the spectator into the film this way. Lang and Brecht get to the same place by another road, and the road changes what it's for. Hitchcock's knowing spectator is being deliciously tortured. This one is a jury. You're handed the evidence ahead of the characters so you will judge the situation — epic theatre's method, carried into the cutting bench.

Which sets up the best idea in the picture. The underground can't give up its man, so it manufactures a case: it plants the assassination on Emil Czaka, the Gestapo's own informer, and lets the occupier's machinery turn on him. A real collaborator gets marked with a crime he didn't commit, by an apparatus that believes its own files. Deleuze's late cinema is full of the forger, the figure who makes truth rather than finds it, and he treats forging as something postwar film discovers once it loses faith in evidence. Lang arrives in 1943 and keeps it in a box. Truth is never undecidable for us; we watch the forgery being assembled. What's startling is who does the forging — not a con artist but a whole population, as tactics, producing a fact the enemy will certify against itself. Fabrication as solidarity.

The parts are traceable. The dragnet, with its parallel cutting between hunters and hunted and the underworld convening its own tribunal, is M rebuilt with the Gestapo in the police role. The interrogation spaces compose people inside rigid geometry the way Metropolis composed its masses, so bodies read as pinned by a graphic order rather than by any one officer. From Kuhle Wampe, the Brecht–Eisler picture of 1932, comes the conviction that a collective can be the protagonist and that the score shouldn't console you about it; Eisler's music here agitates instead of swelling. The Threepenny Opera supplies the dramaturgy of keeping the house one step ahead of the stage. Nothing is borrowed timidly.

Forward, the shadows go straight into noir. Howe and Lang each spent the rest of the decade consolidating it, and Lang's Ministry of Fear and Cloak and Dagger are next door. The larger bequest is the demonstration that a Hollywood suspense machine could carry a political argument without stopping to announce it: under occupation, guilt is shared, and so is agency. The film's fault line, the studio romance braided into Brecht's parable, never resolves. Brecht thought that was the damage. It may be the reason the parable got made at all, on that money, in that year.

So watch the light decide who is exposed. Count the bodies in the frame, and notice the moment the film stops counting them one at a time. And when you catch yourself knowing more than everyone on screen, ask what you're expected to do with it. Lang and Brecht had an answer. It's still a live question.

Concepts in play

  • expressionism — James Wong Howe's low-key, high-contrast light: pooled lamps, hard shadows thrown across walls and faces, figures isolated in darkness; light used as an instrument of pressure in the interrogation scenes, continuous with the Caligari tradition.
  • the gest (Gestus) — Alexander Granach's Inspector Gruber — 'oily, almost comic menace whose banality of manner makes his cruelty more chilling' — an attitude that exposes the occupier/occupied relation rather than a psychology; Brecht, whose term Deleuze adopts, holds a story credit on the film.
  • out-of-field-absolute — The surveillance-as-dread device carried over from The Testament of Dr. Mabuse: an omniscient network and an authority that watches from off-screen, redeployed on occupied Prague so the watching power has no locatable position.
  • dividual — The recurring motif of hostages held and executed in batches until the assassin surrenders, staged 'to make collective fate visible' — individual guilt dissolved into shared jeopardy, solidarity rendered as a spatial fact.
  • action-image, large form — The occupation as a global situation that presses until the decisive act (Svoboda's assassination of Heydrich) transforms it, followed by a second arc in which the counter-plot resolves the hostage crisis.
  • the encompasser (synsign) — Occupied Prague itself — ranks, offices, procedures, Nazi power rendered through order, symmetry and repetition — as the milieu that calls action out of everyone inside it.
  • binomial — Gruber's Gestapo apparatus set directly against the underground: the manhunt, the hostage-taking and the counter-plot staged as force against force.
  • montage-organic-american — The architectural cross-cutting of hunters and hunted inherited from M, with the batch executions supplying a convergent clock beneath the manhunt.
  • the relation-image (mental-image) — Lang's method of withholding and releasing information realized in the cutting, so 'the audience holds more knowledge than any single character' — dramatic irony built as the film's organizing relation, in line with Brecht's audience-ahead-of-the-characters address.
  • the closed set (cadre) — Lang's geometric control, inherited from Metropolis: masses composed within rigid architectural geometry so individuals read as pinned by an impersonal graphic order, carried into the Nazi interrogation spaces; doorways, staircases and windows used as thresholds of danger.
  • the forger — The underground's elaborate counter-plot to fix the blame for the assassination on Emil Czaka, the Gestapo's own informer — truth manufactured collectively as a tactic and certified by the occupier's own apparatus.

How Hangmen Also Die! was received →