← The Night of the Iguana
The Night of the Iguana poster

The Night of the Iguana · essays & theory

1964 · John Huston

A reading · through the lens of theory

Someone has tied an iguana to the base of the veranda, and it strains against the rope through the whole last stretch of the film, fattening for the pot. Huston keeps coming back to it. You don't need anyone to say the phrase — end of his rope — because the animal is already saying it, tugging in the dark while the people above it pull at their own tethers. Start there, with the lizard, and The Night of the Iguana comes into focus as a film about creatures that can no longer get away.

For its first stretch the picture still believes in action. Reverend Shannon herds his busload of outraged Texas Baptists along the coast, sweating, lying, fending off a censorious chaperone and a teenager's infatuation — farce with a motor. Then the bus climbs to Maxine's hilltop hotel and the film essentially stops moving. Deleuze has a name for this stall. In the classic movie a man perceives a situation and acts to change it: situation, action, new situation, a clean circuit. Around 1948, in the films Deleuze loved, that circuit breaks — the character sees more than he can answer, and acting stops resolving anything. He calls it the crisis of the action-image, and Shannon is its portrait. Locked out of his church, drunk, undone, he has simply run out of moves. What's left when action fails? You watch. You endure.

The images that remain, Deleuze says, are pure optical and sound situations — opsigns and sonsigns — and the person stranded inside them is a seer (voyant), a watcher rather than an agent. The long central night is nothing but this: Shannon lashed into a hammock, Hannah beside him with tea, the two of them trading confessions of humiliation and endurance. Nothing is decided. Nobody rescues anybody. Kemplen's editing refuses to chop the exchange into action; it lets the scene run in sustained two-shots, close to real time, so what we feel is duration itself — dead time, Deleuze's temps mort, the everyday held open until it starts to glow.

The hammock is worth stopping on. Burton, strapped down and thrashing, isn't performing an action — he's holding a posture, and the posture says everything about where he's landed. Deleuze calls this the gest: a bodily attitude that lays bare a whole spiritual and social relation without narrating it. Shannon in his ropes and the iguana on its rope rhyme into one image of the cornered. It is a cinema of the body, meaning carried by how people sag and wait rather than by what they do.

Under all of it runs something older and hungrier. Huston's Mexico — the same coast-as-crucible he used in The Treasure of the Sierra Madre — isn't scenery. Figueroa, the great cameraman of María Candelaria and Los Olvidados, shoots the jungle crowding the frame and the sky pressing down, hard light modeling faces until the social surface thins and you can see the drives underneath: Maxine's frank appetite, Shannon's drinking and lust, everyone slipping. Deleuze would call this the impulse-image, and the coast an originary world — a savage zone of pure appetite showing through the seedy hotel perched on top of it. There's a tilt built into the film, a line of slope running toward exhaustion and death, and old Nonno dying mid-poem is where it finally comes out.

And the iguana again, doing double duty. It is the film's symbol in Deleuze's precise sense: the single object that condenses the relation organizing everything around it. Cut the lizard loose and you've said the thing the confessions keep circling — that grace, here, means letting the cornered creature off the rope.

Figueroa's faces are the counterweight. Kerr's Hannah, all banked stillness, is close to what Deleuze means by a qualisign — a face held immobile long enough to become the quality it expresses, compassion made visible. Her quiet account of her two thwarted "love experiences" is the emotional climax precisely because nothing happens in it. It is all face and voice.

Place this in its lineage and the nerve shows. The Williams screen cycle — Streetcar, Cat on a Hot Tin Roof — had already taught Hollywood to film a chamber play through unity of place and confession erupting around one symbolic prop. Iguana takes the dare further: it lets physical action die almost entirely and stakes a prestige studio picture on faces enduring in real time. Figueroa's crisis-of-faith chiaroscuro, worked out for The Fugitive, gives Shannon's reckoning its moral weather. What Huston did, personally, was smuggle the patience of the European time-image — the seer, the dead time, the held face — into a star-packed MGM release and make it pay.

That's the significance. In 1964, with color and CinemaScope the prestige default, Huston shot in black and white and slowed a movie until watching replaced acting, trusting four performers on a veranda to hold us with no plot to save them. The film that came out of the Puerto Vallarta circus is quieter than its own legend.

So watch the lizard. The night these people spend at the end of their rope is bearable only because someone, finally, kneels down and unties something. Whether that's mercy or just fatigue, Huston leaves for you to decide.

Concepts in play

More essays on John Huston’s films