
2024 · Magnus von Horn
A reading · through the lens of theory
Magnus von Horn's film inhabits the impulse-image at its most unsparing: the post-WWI Copenhagen he constructs is Deleuze's 'originary world' made literal — a space of raw, irreducible drives where poverty, pregnancy, and abandonment strip characters down to survival's bare imperatives. Karoline and Dagmar move through this world not as agents with plans but as bodies governed by need, their moral degradation arriving not as choice but as erosion. That world is rendered architecturally through any-space-whatever: cinematographer Dymek's under-motivated light — a gas lamp, a candle barely surviving a corridor — routinely fails to fill rooms, leaving figures half-consumed by shadow in a geometry that functions, as the production's own critical framing explicitly acknowledges, the way it does in Vampyr: darkness not as absence but as active agent, the photographed world made strange by what illumination refuses to reach. The factory floor, the basement, the adoption agency become spaces with no stable coordinates, no exit route the eye can follow. Against these crushing interiors, the film discovers its third register in the affection-image: Trine Dyrholm, drawing directly on the performance model Dreyer demanded of Falconetti in The Passion of Joan of Arc — suffering rendered through facial stillness rather than theatrical expression, the suppression of legible emotion as a heightened, not diminished, form of it — inhabits Dagmar as a face held before any act, warmth and monstrousness suspended in the same close-up until the viewer can no longer parse one from the other. The craft debt is precise: what makes Dagmar terrifying is not what her face reveals but what it withholds.