← This Is England
This Is England poster

This Is England · essays & theory

2007 · Shane Meadows

A reading · through the lens of theory

Start with the flag. The last thing Shaun does in the film is walk to the edge of a flat grey sea and throw a St. George's Cross into the water, and then turn and look at us. He doesn't say anything. He has nowhere to go from there, no next move that resolves what just happened, and the film knows it — so it just holds him, a boy looking at the camera while the tide does what tides do. That shot is the whole argument of the movie pressed into one frame, and it tells you something Shane Meadows understood about the story he was telling: by the end, action has run out. There is nothing Shaun can do to undo what he became.

That exhaustion is worth naming precisely, because for most of its length This Is England runs on the opposite principle. The first half is a machine of doing. A lonely twelve-year-old perceives a situation — a gang, a warmth, a way to be — and acts to enter it. He gets the haircut, he gets the boots and braces, he gets a girl. Each thing he perceives, he reaches for; each reach changes his situation. Deleuze called this the movement-image: the world arrives as a problem the character can answer with his body, and the editing simply follows the answer. Chris Wyatt's cutting in those early gang scenes lets the energy flow — handheld, loose, the camera discovering the play rather than framing it — because nothing yet blocks the circuit between seeing and doing. Woody's gang is a milieu that calls forth belonging, and Shaun belongs.

Then Combo comes home from prison, and the film begins to break its own engine. Watch what Stephen Graham actually does in the famous monologue: he stands very still and makes a case. Meadows stages it — learning the geometry from Alan Clarke and the inhabited-extremism from Mike Leigh's Naked — so that the racism is charismatic, so that you feel its pull on a grieving boy whose father died in the Falklands for a contested idea of England. The dossier's word is precise: Combo's speech lands on that wound. And here is the thing the film does to Shaun that it also does to its own form. After this, action stops solving anything. The violence, when it comes, is sudden and incompletely seen, and the camera does the cruelest possible thing with it — it holds the aftermath longer than the act. Cohen tightens the frame, holds the shot, and forces us to stay. We can no longer do anything either. We can only look.

That is what Deleuze means by a pure optical situation — an opsign. The sensory-motor link, perceive-then-act, snaps, and what's left is a watcher who can only endure what he sees. Shaun in the second half becomes what Deleuze calls a seer rather than an agent. He witnesses Combo's brutalisation of Milky, and there is no act that answers it. The film has carried us from a cinema of movement into a cinema of time, and the strange achievement is that it does this without ever announcing it — the transition is managed, the dossier notes, gradually rather than schematically, the edits 'becoming slightly less forgiving of digression' as the story darkens. The form deteriorates in lockstep with the boy. Even the film stock cooperates: the Super 16 grain grows coarser in the second half, as if the material were registering the rot. An aristocracy of feeling — Woody's gentle, multiracial little kingdom — is shown decomposing from within once Combo opens the fault line. Deleuze had a name for that too: a crystalline world rotting at its core.

The whole film is built to make this legible, and the technology is the argument. Shooting on Super 16 isn't nostalgia. The format narrows the visual bandwidth, kills background information, and pushes everything onto faces — and faces are where this film lives. Turgoose's face is the instrument: it registers loneliness, then the open joy of being wanted, then the slow contamination, none of it looking performed. Deleuze's term for the face that holds a single quality, immobile and reflecting, is the affection-image, the icon — and that final look at the sea is exactly that, a face given to us as pure unresolved feeling with no action left to discharge it into. The reflecting wonder of the early scenes and the stranded grief of the last shot are the same device at two ends of a life.

None of this is invented from nothing. The lineage is a real chain of craft. Loach's Kes gave Meadows the founding bet — that an untrained working-class child's unschooled face is the film's deepest source of truth, the exact principle that produced Turgoose. Clarke's Made in Britain, Meadows' stated primary reference, set the formal problem of staying close to a radicalised boy without the camera condemning or joining him. Scum taught the staging of male hierarchy through who stands and who is forced down, and the grammar of showing violence by its consequences. Quadrophenia turned a subcultural soundtrack into evidence — which is exactly how Meadows uses ska and reggae to prove the skinhead movement's Jamaican-rooted, multiracial origins before Combo's Oi and nationalist records corrupt the very sound. Leigh's improvisation method built the gang's hierarchy from behavior rather than exposition.

What This Is England did, finally, was take the most exhausted move in cinema — the coming-of-age arc — and run it backwards into the time-image. It does not place Shaun outside ideology and judge him. It shows the machinery by which a grieving child walks in, and then it strands him where no action can carry him out, and asks us to sit in that with him. The question it leaves open is the one Combo couldn't answer and Shaun inherits: what do you do with a love of home that someone has taught you to spend as hate? The film doesn't close it. It hands you the flag, and the sea, and a boy's face, and lets you keep watching.

Concepts in play

Sightlines essays that trace this film

Critical essays that trace a line through this film and others.